How do I tag this?

How do you tag posts such as post #2388295 where there is a clear outline of breasts under clothing but they are entirely concealed and not presented in a sexual manner?

chodorov said:

How do you tag posts such as post #2388295 where there is a clear outline of breasts under clothing but they are entirely concealed and not presented in a sexual manner?

for that pic, I'd tag impossible_clothes and taut_clothes on it.

================================
post #2295273
Is this a combination of detached_sleeves and puffy_short_sleeves?

I've always tagged them as such :c.
Since they are detached. And they look kinda puffy and short.

Sacriven said:

for that pic, I'd tag impossible_clothes and taut_clothes on it.

================================
post #2295273
Is this a combination of detached_sleeves and puffy_short_sleeves?

Okay that one is impossible clothing, but what about just girls where you can see the figure of their breasts through their clothing?

chodorov said:

Okay that one is impossible clothing, but what about just girls where you can see the figure of their breasts through their clothing?

I don't quite understand. Can you provide me an example, just in case?
see-through maybe?

Sacriven said:

I don't quite understand. Can you provide me an example, just in case?
see-through maybe?

post #2378160
post #2388149

Like above. I mean when you cannot see the flesh of the breasts but can see the outline and she isn't presenting them or such. Clearly you can see the outline of the breasts but cannot actually see them.

chodorov said:

post #2378160
post #2388149

Like above. I mean when you cannot see the flesh of the breasts but can see the outline and she isn't presenting them or such. Clearly you can see the outline of the breasts but cannot actually see them.

I think in these cases, just tag in breasts is enough.

post #2388879: lightning-bolt-like anger thingies

☆♪ said:

post #2388879: lightning-bolt-like anger thingies

lightning_bolt?
------

post #2388882

background composition

edit: inset is what I'm looking for

☆♪ said:

post #2388879: lightning-bolt-like anger thingies

denpa

Nitrogen09 said:

I think in these cases, just tag in breasts is enough.

Okay that makes since. However I have two points.

• The wiki should then emphasize that the tag should be used when the outline is visible but the actual breasts are not seen.

• There should be a tag like breasts_under_clothing for when breasts are not visible but you can see their outline.

chodorov said:

Okay that makes since. However I have two points.

• The wiki should then emphasize that the tag should be used when the outline is visible but the actual breasts are not seen.

• There should be a tag like breasts_under_clothing for when breasts are not visible but you can see their outline.

Although it's good to have a specific tag for it, personally I against it. "breast under clothing" is too vague, for a micro_bikini is still considered as clothing.

You can use breasts -nipples -cleavage if you want pics with breast outline visible from clothes (although several undertagged pics with cleavage will inevitably appear).

How are those glasses" tagged?
post #2389539

Provence said:

How are those glasses" tagged?
post #2389539

monocle

kuuderes_shadow said:

monocle

This doesnt't look like a monocle, though.

Provence said:

How are those glasses" tagged?
post #2389539

kuuderes_shadow said:

monocle

plus pince-nez

So there isn't a tag when one half is missing? Hmm.
______
post #2389763
The red things she is wearing on her fingers.

Provence said:

post #2389763
The red things she is wearing on her fingers.

They look like single-finger gloves, but I can't find a tag for that

fossilnix said:

They look like single-finger gloves, but I can't find a tag for that

not sure if half_gloves can cover those.

I think those are her fingers on that color and not any kind of gloves.