[bulk] Frills

create implication frilled_ribbon -> frills
create implication frilled_ribbon -> ribbon
create implication frilled_tabard -> frills
create implication frilled_tabard -> tabard
create implication frilled_pillow -> frills
create implication frilled_pillow -> pillow
create implication frilled_shirt -> frills
create implication frilled_shirt -> shirt
create implication frilled_shorts -> frills
create implication frilled_shorts -> shorts
create implication frilled_shawl -> frills
create implication frilled_shawl -> shawl
create implication frilled_gloves -> frills
create implication frilled_gloves -> gloves
create implication frilled_hat -> frills
create implication frilled_hat -> hat
create implication frilled_leotard -> frills
create implication frilled_collar -> frills
create implication frilled_collar -> collar
create implication frilled_choker -> frills
create implication frilled_choker -> choker
create implication frilled_boots -> frills
create implication frilled_boots -> boots
create implication frilled_bikini -> frilled_swimsuit

Link to request

Just some things.
The last one with the bikini is just an implication that is deduced from the implication from bikini to swimsuit.

I'd hold back on that last one for now. The following bikini -> swimsuit implications exist:

bikini aside -> swimsuit aside
bikini under clothes -> swimsuit under clothes
highleg bikini -> highleg swimsuit
polka dot bikini -> polka dot swimsuit
striped bikini -> striped swimsuit
white bikini -> white swimsuit

However, the same implications do not exist for the following tags:

aqua bikini, black bikini, blue bikini, camouflage bikini, checkered bikini, frilled bikini, green bikini, orange bikini, pink bikini, plaid bikini, purple bikini, red bikini, vertical-striped bikini, yellow bikini

Do we want bikini to always implicate its swimsuit counterpart, which would necessitate creating implications for the above tags, or should the two be separate, and only the "bikini -> swimsuit" implication will remain?

Good question
But I see that they all belong to the same group: Colored bikinis. And since we started adding some bikinis to swimsuit I'd say: All or nothing^^.
(ok, there are three exceptions)

Hmm, if no one raises an objection, I'd do another bulk request for the swimsuits/bikinis.

BrokenEagle98 said:

Do we want bikini to always implicate its swimsuit counterpart, which would necessitate creating implications for the above tags, or should the two be separate, and only the "bikini -> swimsuit" implication will remain?

I have a strong preference for the latter. The base bikini->swimsuit implication is good because the latter is meant as a very generalized tag, but the rest are much more useful as separate tags IMO.

EB said:

I have a strong preference for the latter. The base bikini->swimsuit implication is good because the latter is meant as a very generalized tag, but the rest are much more useful as separate tags IMO.

I have a strong preference for the latter as well. If I want to search for, let's say a polka dot swimsuit and not a polka dot bikini, with the prior scheme, I've got to sort through all of the posts which have either a polka dot swimsuit or a polka dot bikini, or both to find what I want.

I've removed the frilled_bikini -> frilled_swimsuit from the request for right now, since it is a separate issue.

The bulk update request #507 has been approved.