Tag implication: >_< -> closed_eyes

create implication >_< -> closed_eyes

Link to implication

The wiki itself said the eyes are closed really shut.

This is highly visually distinct, I don't really see a point in implicating it.

Doesn't that make several of the implications pointless by that standard? Like :d implicating open mouth or anything food related implicating food?

No? If searching closed_eyes I wouldn't expect >_< images tho show up. If searching food I would 100% expect specific types of food to show up. Open mouth is kind of in the middle but closer to expect than not.

I just felt that >_< does mean that the eyes are closed one way or another, whether tightly or normally. Since its part of the category of eyes being closed, it should be implied.

create implication >_< -> closed_eyes

Link to request

The last request had an error.

Bulk update request #253 failed: Error: Antecedent name has already been taken (create implication >_< -> closed_eyes)

The bulk update request #253 has been rejected.

This implication was already created.

The tag implication >_< -> closed_eyes has been rejected.