Toks said:
Fixed ... Fixed
Thanks as usual for the prompt fixes.
-
Toks said:
This is because two favgroups owned by different users can have the same name so that's ambiguous. Whereas two favgroups owned by the same user must have different names.
I thought about this but that's still ambiguous in a different way. favgroup:r0d3n7z:Test_favgroup might refer to your favgroup named "Test_favgroup" or it might refer to a favgroup named "r0d3n7z:Test_favgroup" owned by the user doing this search.
Sorry for not being clear about it, I *was* aware of the first issue being by design due to name ambiguity, hence my namespace suggestion... too bad that idea doesn't work out, though.
-
Type-kun said:
As for feature requests, I'm sure users would appreciate a more convenient way of adding a post to a favgroup. Favoriting currently takes a single keypress, but for adding to favgroup you should either add favgroup:id tag to post or add post id to favgroup.
Since each user can have multiple favgroups, it can't be a single keypress, but we could do two keypresses:
- I don't think 'g' is currently bound as a hotkey. We could bind 'g' to pop up a numbered list of your favgroups
- Either click the desired group name, or we could additionally bind 1 thru 0 for the groups (since users can have up to 10 favgroups at plat+)
- similar to "add artist commentary" popup; esc to abort
-
Currently, fav:<username>, and favgroup:id / favgroup:name metatags work for adding to favorites / favgroups, either from the post edit box, or as a tag script.
However, the negation doesn't work, i.e. -fav:<username>, and -favgroup:id / -favgroup:name will not remove posts from your favorites list or your favgroup.
I would love for the negation to work, which will be an excellent way to quickly migrate posts from plain-old-favs to favgroups (e.g. tag script -fav:r0d3n7z favgroup:comics).
Also, if we don't bind a hotkey for favgroup, this would be the next best thing, since users can still quickly add to faves using 'f', and then sort the posts fairly painlessly later. We'd have to write some help/cheatsheet documentation about it, though.
-
Do favgroups fundamentally behave like pools in the backend? If so, porting the "Order" functionality from pools would be very much appreciated too.