Somehow I doubt Montjeu wouldn't mind being called grandma/grandpa by Panthalassa, especially if he's pleading for someone to help him from Grass Wonder
Edit: Huh it somehow fixed itself after I posted this comment. Idk why but danbooru was doing this weird thing with my two recent uploads where I'd click on the edit button multiple times but nothing would happen (it would work just fine for other images!). Might need to see if the bug is replicable...
Every time I see a koishi with the claws from this artist I get so overwhelmed with cuteness that I start writhing and make rabies noises because I can't process it
This doesn't seem correct to tag ai-generated art (topic). It's not criticizing or commenting on AI art and its effects on artists, etc. Rather it seems to be straight-forward ai-assisted, with a generator providing a base design that the artist uses only as inspiration.
This doesn't seem correct to tag ai-generated art (topic). It's not criticizing or commenting on AI art and its effects on artists, etc. Rather it seems to be straight-forward ai-assisted, with a generator providing a base design that the artist uses only as inspiration.
The wiki page for ai_generated_art (topic) said:
For posts about the subject of AI-generated art. A common use of this tag is for re-drawings of an AI-generated image
The wiki page for ai_generated_art (topic) actually says:
For posts about the subject of AI-generated art. A common use of this tag is for re-drawings of an AI-generated image that has gone viral.
(emphasis added)
Such viral images nearly always are intended to mock AI generated art and highlight its shortcomings. They are about AI-generated art in a way this work is not.
The tag ai-assisted has acquired a negative nuance on Danbooru by association, and also because it is sometimes applied in a way that means "I think this is AI generated but can't prove it" or "I think this is AI generated with minimal touchup by a human being." These connotations may lead to an inclination toward using ai-generated art (topic) as a kind of euphemism. However, the way AI generation is used here, solely as a source of initial inspiration for a work which is a product of a person's technique, is I think a useful and legitimate approach. ai-assisted need not be a mark of shame in this case.
Ado's Shinzou performance featured a surprise guest appearance by Miku.
They performed a brand new song: 桜日和とタイムマシン ("Sakura Biyori to Time Machine" / "Cherry Blossom Weather and Time Machine") written by Mafumafu (previously collabed with Ado on Kokoro to Iu Na no Fukakai) with Miku tuned by Mitchie M (previously collabed with Ado on All Night Radio) (Both have an extensive history as Vocaloid producers.)
How did you come to the conclusion that this was ai-generated? From an artist that has never generated anything before or after this (that we know of), looks like the rest of the artist's stuff around that time, and was posted in response to a challenge to "draw these funny generated touhous"?
However it looks and sounds like this is a direct product of the generator itself, in which case it should be tagged ai-generated and deleted.
The Twitter post is from 2021-12-13[1]. Stable Diffusion was released in August 2022[2][3]. Find me a model from late 2021 that can generate images as coherent and consistent with the artist's usual style as this post.
The Twitter post is from 2021-12-13[1]. Stable Diffusion was released in August 2022[2][3]. Find me a model from late 2021 that can generate images as coherent and consistent with the artist's usual style as this post.
Encountering this post under ai-generated art (topic) tag along with posts like post #7486384 and post #7486418, along with the previous discussion here, I came to the conclusion that this post was associated with the hashtag "#aigeneratedtohou" as well, without the obvious redrawing those other posts have. Given the original tweet date you mention, that was clearly a mistake on my part.
These drawings are literally redraws of ai-generatedTouhou OCs. If anything, the idea of that tag not applying is absurd. They are undeniably within the scope of the tag. So unless you care to tell me how else one would be able to indicate that situation beyond ai-generated art (topic), then I'd like to ask you to quit making a fool of yourself in arguing against that tag's inclusion on a post that is literally a redraw of an ai-generated image, one of the main uses of the damn tag.