Melvin has gone into a Catatonic breakdown. The last straw was: Ate without table.
I genuinely hate that part of Rimworld. I once installed a table just outside the pantry, these morons would rather stand in the cold than walk five meters to sit down. And then he'd try to flirt with a married woman, get rebuked, and get sad about it. EIGHT TIMES. I ended up so pissed at his stupidity that I had him euthanized and buried. We had to deal without our best craftsman, but my blood pressure appreciated it.
I genuinely hate that part of Rimworld. I once installed a table just outside the pantry, these morons would rather stand in the cold than walk five meters to sit down. And then he'd try to flirt with a married woman, get rebuked, and get sad about it. EIGHT TIMES. I ended up so pissed at his stupidity that I had him euthanized and buried. We had to deal without our best craftsman, but my blood pressure appreciated it.
That's why you build wood tables with wood chairs all around the map with a specific distance. That way nobody gonna get the 'eat without table' mood debuff, those will delay raiders from reaching your main base, and help your colonists train their construction skill.
That, or simply download a mod that prevents your pawn from carrying meals around with them. If you wanna go the 'opposite' way of getting solution, there's a mod that instakills any pawn that ate without a table...no mood problem if the colonist died, right? (except for the other colonists...)
I genuinely hate that part of Rimworld. I once installed a table just outside the pantry, these morons would rather stand in the cold than walk five meters to sit down. And then he'd try to flirt with a married woman, get rebuked, and get sad about it. EIGHT TIMES. I ended up so pissed at his stupidity that I had him euthanized and buried. We had to deal without our best craftsman, but my blood pressure appreciated it.
Did you tried eating a meal without a table? It's difficult and annoying, although I would agree I find it the ridiculous things that could snap people, but then again I seen worse.
Hmm, I suppose the British girl could do *some* damage by throwing her loaded submachine gun, but that *might* not be the right approach. You'd probably be better off using it as a melee weapon, so you could at least get more than one hit in.
Also I'm not sure if the Soviet girl is holding an anti-tank grenade or a bottle of some sort...
Hmm, I suppose the British girl could do *some* damage by throwing her loaded submachine gun, but that *might* not be the right approach. You'd probably be better off using it as a melee weapon, so you could at least get more than one hit in.
Also I'm not sure if the Soviet girl is holding an anti-tank grenade or a bottle of some sort...
It's a molotov During WW2 in the early fights against the Germans, especially against tanks, they would improvise by throwing them on the engine area to burn out the engine or at the view ports to blind them. They did have AT grenades but a lot of the times, if not most of the time, there was supply shortage.
It's a molotov During WW2 in the early fights against the Germans, especially against tanks, they would improvise by throwing them on the engine area to burn out the engine or at the view ports to blind them. They did have AT grenades but a lot of the times, if not most of the time, there was supply shortage.
Ah, interesting. I had thought of that, but I always thought Molotov cocktails used burning rags as fuses, and didn't see one here. I guess this is the OG version with a "storm match" for ignitor which I hadn't seen before. TIL. Thanks!
It's a molotov During WW2 in the early fights against the Germans, especially against tanks, they would improvise by throwing them on the engine area to burn out the engine or at the view ports to blind them. They did have AT grenades but a lot of the times, if not most of the time, there was supply shortage.
LOL NO Molotov. Soviets hated the fact they always found bottles of schnapps instead of their beloved vodka among the German stuff they left while fleeing westward... and the cheap Sten had a tendency to fail and have stoppages or misfeeds if you did hold the magazine in the middle of a firefight. Also it did not have any proper rear grip.
The Sten pictured propably has a stoppage: The cocking lever is almost to the front, but the cartridge is still visible. The bolt failed to close and feed a cartridge.
Hmm, I suppose the British girl could do *some* damage by throwing her loaded submachine gun, but that *might* not be the right approach. You'd probably be better off using it as a melee weapon, so you could at least get more than one hit in.
Also I'm not sure if the Soviet girl is holding an anti-tank grenade or a bottle of some sort...
The early STEN smgs were known for jamming discharges thus firing the entire mag with no way to stop. It's funny in retrospect not so much irl
