I believe by "'big woman' boom", the artist means a very recent trend on Pixiv to post pictures of デカ女, unusually huge women. (I think the word is read as DEKA-onna, literally "deca-woman", as in the metric prefix deca- for multiplying by 10.) This Pixiv page explains the term, and post #7638840 (a KonoSuba reference) pokes fun at the trend.
Young Hoshino: "You are the student council president of Abydos, are you not?!" Young Hoshino: "How about you be a bit more self aware of the responsibilities that you have, for once?!"
Present Hoshino: "Really... what an awful kouhai I was..."
Also, "Memory Tour" seems to be a reference to a certain part in Attack on Titan? If anyone else's familiar with it and you think this post warrants the copyright tag, then please do so.
Where the hell did this one come from...? I found it on a BCY reverse search one day, and never was able to find the proper source for it. I think it might've been in one of the ads...? But from where? And who drew it? It's driving me crazy.
One can argue that this is what Vegito should've looked like when Goku and Vegito fused with the Potara against Zamasu, but personally, that torso armor over the T-shirt looks too weird and off in my opinion.
Probably the bad anatomy or low quality, also i founded that pic on pinterest and YouTube
MalikH said:
The Low Quality I think is what break the rule sadly. The same with my post
My point was that just because a post was deleted doesn't mean it breaks the rules.
Vanniaa67's post was deleted because it was not approved within 3 days after posting. The quality is not bad in my opinion and I don't see any glaring anatomical issues, though that doesn't necessarily mean the Approvers would think it's good enough for this site. However, even good posts are unlikely to be approved if they are not properly sourced. That post is borderline content at worst, so you could update the source field with the correct URL and appeal the post for another chance.
MalikH's post, on the other hand, was manually deleted, which is usually only done when a post breaks the rules. Images made with avatar generators are typically against the rules, though to be fair, it is not actually stated in help:upload rules or the tag wikis that they are, so they should be updated.
Most users are going to have some posts that weren't approved within three days because the quality wasn't good enough or because it didn't fit the Approvers' tastes, but it's usually only the bottom-of-the-barrel stuff that will get manually deleted. That's what breaks the rules: works that have little to no artistic effort put into them.
My point was that just because a post was deleted doesn't mean it breaks the rules.
Vanniaa67's post was deleted because it was not approved within 3 days after posting. The quality is not bad in my opinion and I don't see any glaring anatomical issues, though that doesn't necessarily mean the Approvers would think it's good enough for this site. However, even good posts are unlikely to be approved if they are not properly sourced. That post is borderline content at worst, so you could update the source field with the correct URL and appeal the post for another chance.
MalikH's post, on the other hand, was manually deleted, which is usually only done when a post breaks the rules. Images made with avatar generators are typically against the rules, though to be fair, it is not actually stated in help:upload rules or the tag wikis that they are, so they should be updated.
Most users are going to have some posts that weren't approved within three days because the quality wasn't good enough or because it didn't fit the Approvers' tastes, but it's usually only the bottom-of-the-barrel stuff that will get manually deleted. That's what breaks the rules: works that have little to no artistic effort put into them.
