The work cited in the first part is On The Divine Names written by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. He is historically believed to be an attempt at author theft, to piggyback on the good name of Dionysius the Areopagite (Saint), though historical misattribution remains a possibility. He is also: not Dionysius the Great (Pope), not Denis of Paris (Saint and martyr), not Dionysius of Halicarnassus (historian), and definitely not the the vicarious Greek god Dionysius.
Yes I did. And I said that HoM&M 4 had better writing than this. I never said it had bad writing, and I was specifically referring to Gauldoth Half-Dead's conversations with the Priestess who travelled with him, and their thoughts about the relationships between good and evil and love and hate.
And why the devil do you guys downvote me saying I don't understand what someone's else is talking about? Seems like it should be a good thing to ask for clarification instead of making assumptions, like some of you seem to be doing.
It's an expansion. I only played the base game, and I'll admit I didn't complete all the campaigns, and I hear the writing in the expansions aren't all that good.
