Donmai

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

Bicorn said:

Added artistic error tag because Urara's bow is on the wrong ear. (I know it sounds minor but it's actually pretty significant with Umamusume characters.)

For the non-horse guys, the ear ornament or any one of those asymmetries these characters have denote their real life genders... If a character has an ear bow or what not to their right (ie. Gold Ship, Special Week), they'd be a colt or stallion. Haru Urara meanwhile is a mare IRL...

  • 3
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Oh_My said:

    I'm hesitant to say it was Quiet, but she's a better shot than that.

    Quiet got btfo when she missed her mark in Mission 11 too. The difference is that the assassin was executed instead of recruited to Outer Texas.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Zeroes said:

    One day we will return together to our home bathed in rays of gold.

    I keep thinking that Godrick used to be a botanist before the Shattering, and that he'd graft plants together to try to make a mallorn, a tree with gold leaves. Not golden leaves, but gold leaves.

  • 5
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Zonca said:

    Ah I get it, she accidentally opened the wrong door and had to "clean up" to hide her embarassment, so she's 2 hours late, classic Bocchi

    Had that been the case then she most likely would've gotten another text asking where she is or the person directly telling her it's the wrong door, instead it seems like Bocchi did everyting right on her and the customer either fell asleep or simply forgot about the order, forcing her anxiety-riddled ass to wait in the spot for someone to receive the package... and being to whatever unholy thing went over the other door.

  • 24
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Took a bit of a liberty with translating the girl's name. Originally, her name is Doji from the word dojikko (ドジっ娘) "clumsy person" but it didn't feel right to me translating her name as Doji or Clumsy (who names their kid Clumsy?). So I translated her name as something that rolls off the tongue easily while still sounding like both a name/still retains the original meaning: Ditzi.

    Updated

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Took a bit of a liberty with the translation, rendering Zanmu's line as a direct play on the famous "Rapunzel! Rapunzel! Let down your hair, That I may climb thy golden stair!" More literally, she's bluntly telling Reimu something to the effect of "Well then, use this to come up to my side" with speech patterns that make her sound elderly.

    If people feel that I've been unacceptably free with the translation I decided on, maybe try this instead:
    "Be a darling and clamber up here, won't you? Use this!"

  • 0
  • Reply
  • Show 4 more comments
    [hidden]

    岩戸鈴芽 said:

    You don't need to respond like that to people just giving additional information. You could've done with just saying "there's also the eyebrows and bangs" and left it at that.

    They weren't "giving additional information" they were explaining that they recognized it as AI only after looking at the "artist's" account. All I did was point out how unnecessary it is to go through the effort of looking for evidence when the image is covered in easily identifiable AI artifacts.

    I didn't even say anything rude? What's your problem?

  • -4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    All I did was point out how unnecessary it is to go through the effort of looking for evidence when the image is covered in easily identifiable AI artifacts.

    It is necessary because a lot of people here point out "flaws" in images that turns out aren't actually AI. I provided conclusive proof instead of "hmm this part looks AI to me".

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    岩戸鈴芽 said:

    Your comment was a textbook "duh can't you all see this" tone.

    See above + you doing this in a lot of comment sections.

    That's not how I meant it, but sorry I offended you enough with a comment not directed at you to pick a fight with me over nothing. Please forgive me, manners police, for being anything less than obnoxiously polite in every interaction I have with other people online.

    I really don't care if you have a problem with the way I talk. It's not breaking any rules, and I'm not going to stop doing nothing wrong because it bothers you.

  • -6
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    They weren't "giving additional information" they were explaining that they recognized it as AI only after looking at the "artist's" account. All I did was point out how unnecessary it is to go through the effort of looking for evidence when the image is covered in easily identifiable AI artifacts.

    I didn't even say anything rude? What's your problem?

    Many non-AI posts are being flagged simply because someone pointed out a few negative aspects. It's important to check the artist's account to verify their work. If it turns out the artist is not using AI and some of their posts are deleted and tagged as AI-generated, future uploaders might avoid archiving their works here.
    :PolkaGun:

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    You really don't need all that evidence to identify this as AI. The multiple sets of eyebrows and the mess all over her bangs and eyes is already telling enough.

    Look if I didn't hesitate uploading this, I would have. What made me hesitate was simply how much it copies the anime's/kerorira's art direction. Copying is certainly something an AI can understand but even this isn't a consistent reason to hesitate, people make style parodys all the time.

    Many smaller flaws an AI can make were simply major artistic issues that were vetted in the queue years ago. Humans can make any number of mistakes an AI can, barring a few like the lineart not following the lighting, and even then, photobashing is a thing artists sometimes do. At this point, understanding the pattern of mistakes or liberties individual artists do across several artworks is probably a better way of knowing. If you're only looking at a single image that has been picked from a hundred generated at the same time, each with their own random, inhuman flaws, that can never be checked because they are immediately deleted, you will be debating all day about whether artists or a specific artist would "sometimes make random mistakes".

    Updated

  • 3
  • Reply