Instead of calling Rinne Tsukihime an officially licensed GBA port, it sounds more accurately it's a licensed converter released during winter comiket 2001. It's software that will convert the PC game into a rom for the GBA. It's expected that one owns the original game to be able to use this.
Instead of calling Rinne Tsukihime an officially licensed GBA port, it sounds more accurately it's a licensed converter released during winter comiket 2001. It's software that will convert the PC game into a rom for the GBA. It's expected that one owns the original game to be able to use this.
so you're telling me the problem with cannibalism in our society is getting food poison and not the moral implications that come with taking a human life?
Ngl if you really think about it if we practiced cannibalism we would not only solve world hunger, but also overpopulation and reduce deforestation massively as we wouldnโt have to chop down rainforests for farms.
Also we slaughter hundreds of millions of animals a day not just for food but for our clothes and we also inflict immense suffering on animals such as literally raping cows just to make milk. Cannibalism might inflict less suffering than factory farming, and would help us stop factory farming as we will not be eating as much animal meat.
Ngl if you really think about it if we practiced cannibalism we would not only solve world hunger, but also overpopulation and reduce deforestation massively as we wouldnโt have to chop down rainforests for farms.
Also we slaughter hundreds of millions of animals a day not just for food but for our clothes and we also inflict immense suffering on animals such as literally raping cows just to make milk. Cannibalism might inflict less suffering than factory farming, and would help us stop factory farming as we will not be eating as much animal meat.
Chickens will eat just about anything that they can gobble down they're like walking bird trash cans which includes other chickens but they don't go out of their way to kill another to eat them
Ngl if you really think about it if we practiced cannibalism we would not only solve world hunger, but also overpopulation and reduce deforestation massively as we wouldnโt have to chop down rainforests for farms.
Also we slaughter hundreds of millions of animals a day not just for food but for our clothes and we also inflict immense suffering on animals such as literally raping cows just to make milk. Cannibalism might inflict less suffering than factory farming, and would help us stop factory farming as we will not be eating as much animal meat.
mf read Johnathan Swift's Modest Proposal and didn't get the joke
mf read Johnathan Swift's Modest Proposal and didn't get the joke
This is a common misconception. Johnathan Swift doesnโt suggest that the poor eat their babies, but instead that they sell their babies as food to the rich. He also makes calculations on how much their meat would be worth.
A Modest Proposal is directly making fun of capitalism, and more specifically business owners through this. It makes fun of the idea of business in general with making out the price of the meat and trying to make a profit, as well as pointing out the unethical practices of business owners.
In a post capitalist society cannibalism can still be mandated and managed by the state for good purposes.
We humans have a risk of getting prion disease every time we eat someone of our own species. It is incurable, horrible beyond measures and not a single person in the world wants to go out the way a prion disease will do to you.
coincidentally i just had this conversation today, and i had a theory that the aversion to cannibalism is an evolutionary trait that developed out of social animals like human. because social animals depend on each others to survive, it is disadvantageous for them to eat each others - rather than banding together & cooperating to find food (& distribute food, & preserve food) more efficiently. over time, natural selection weeded out those who practiced cannibalism, leaving those who doesn't. enough time passed and the "no-cannibalism" rule is somewhat hard-coded into genetic, producing adversed physiological effect in (most of) those who practices cannibalism (alongside the societal taboo).
when you look into other species, cannibalism is not really that taboo in general; nature is hardcore after all. a pair of rabbits (or any other rodents) having produced too much offsprings that they can't feed, may resort to offing some of their weakest offsprings to recover some proteins.
I think the Commander is losing it and thinks he still in his Griffin and Krueger days where Commanders could send several platoons at the battlefield.
