It's not meaningless, but rather a reflection of what the users want to see.
So @Punished_Kiki given that this post now has had a higher score than your comment for a while, does that mean you're going to stop posting comments given that the community doesn't want to see them?
This is not the politically partisan plaza you think it is where people are going to put you in a pedestal because you were courageous enough to state the same bland and irrelevant opinion anyone else could've spit out. You're just going to be a bright target for rotten eggs after a few months, because your statements are meaningless and devoid of any depth. It happens every single time, no matter the side. You gotta stop posting this kind of regurgitated garbage man, and you really gotta stop thinking anyone but a few selected handful of parasites and syncophants cares about your personal political opinion on a public non-news site. I would've expected someone who's been here for 20 years to understand this better than the average blue-color proselytizer of the flavor of the year political movement.
Complaining about Donald Trump on a Donald Trump post just makes you look like a retard. Nobody cares that you hate the orange man. Nobody wants to read your political opinion on how bad the orange man is on a fucking Jojo meme of the orange man. Nobody fucking cares. Your kind of comment is possibly even worse than hornyposters. At least those make people laugh. Yours just make people exasperated.
Nobody argues politics in good faith online, absolutely nobody. I hope you've learned something from this chain of comments. Or maybe not, and you'll be shat on by the community again in 4 to 8 years for the exact same thing. See you then.
I really don't understand how a timelapse of a completely different image is supposed to prove this image isn't AI or that the artist has never used AI. All this proves is that they have some decent skill, but being skilled at something doesn't mean someone wouldn't cheat.
Like, you guys are some of the most gullible people I've ever seen. "B-but it says "Not AI" in their bio!" Yeah like no one's ever lied on the internet before. The artist obviously used AI in https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8759675, and there's no real reason to think they wouldn't use it in other works.
I really don't understand how a timelapse of a completely different image is supposed to prove this image isn't AI or that the artist has never used AI. All this proves is that they have some decent skill, but being skilled at something doesn't mean someone wouldn't cheat.
Like, you guys are some of the most gullible people I've ever seen. "B-but it says "Not AI" in their bio!" Yeah like no one's ever lied on the internet before. The artist obviously used AI in https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8759675, and there's no real reason to think they wouldn't use it in other works.
Then people are honestly better off picking the images that are known to be AI instead of potentially crying wolf. Itโs really just Innocent Until Proven Guilty imo
