Not sure whether to actually tag as Midorikawa_Ruriko. The name in the commentary is very close, yes, but I'm not sure whether it's just "inspired by" rather than being the actual character.
Don't really agree with the bullying but at the same time some memes just don't land well with in certain circumstances. The Mika ones are funny since it's a bit true to her character of being a racist idiot who acts on her impulses, Nimi doesn't work as well since in her PL she legit had a bit of a panic attack and edited out an entire VOD because she spelled out a series of letters that could've been misconstrued as a slur for gay people unintentionally. I doubt the artist was wanting her to look like a racist idiot, but more something like a brat wanting her veggie tendies or something (which is a bit in character for her) but that only works when you don't know the context of the meme, yet the punchline of the meme only really works if you do know the context of it which is essentially an idiot is acting out on an airplane and calls someone a slur while looking ridiculous wearing a burger king crown and being a huge bother to people.
Mind you this doesn't excuse anybody harassing an artist for what is essentially making an unfunny meme with unfortunate implications though. They did had the courtesy of not putting it in the main art tag that could've caused a bit of a stir if Nimi retweeted what seemed to be a silly art with no other implications.
Wait. A Christian lesbian wedding? Gensokyo is progressive.
*A Christian lesbian wedding of a shinto shrine maiden and a witch, with a pagan fairy as the bible bearer, pagan goddess as bestwoman/man/bridesmaid and literal daemons as godfathers/mothers
The Fandom post was made on the 20th of May 2019, so by sorting the URLs by name, you can easily narrow down the time of a tweet. In this case tweet 1129448051364335616 and anything before it. Only 9 Tweets fall in that period and they unfortunately do not have the original.
I think in situations like this you could just edit out the watermark and ugly SOURCE text on the top. It's a degraded copy of a degraded copy anyway and the original has seemingly been lost, why not clean it up a little?
I think in situations like this you could just edit out the watermark and ugly SOURCE text on the top. It's a degraded copy of a degraded copy anyway and the original has seemingly been lost, why not clean it up a little?
Yeah sure just one more level of degradation won't hurt right
Yeah sure just one more level of degradation won't hurt right
The ifunny logo could’ve been removed without affecting the actual image, though it would’ve resulted in an MD5 mismatch. I don’t think any other edits should be made to it, though.
Her arm and neck ribbon would probably look absurdly long, had this be on real hardware - considering the gap between the two screens to make way for the mic, fold, and battery indicator.
