It's not too long, but rather the width/girth gets obscured because it's buried below Trigger's ass. If anything, Trigger's fingers looks like Pocky sticks...
I was unsure if there was a good tag for this, so I decided to create “nearly_naked_dress”. I know of at least one other post that could use it, and it is one of Texas funnily enough.
I think you're misunderstanding something. Read this comment thread from the beginning. Take note of this comment (emphasis mine):
You mean it's possible Provence couldn't be bothered to read the entire discussion before mistakenly telling someone they were wrong about something? I'm sure that's never happened before...
You are out of the loop or are mistaking users. Paid rewards had nothing to do with this user's specific case.
I think you're misunderstanding something. Read this comment thread from the beginning. Take note of this comment (emphasis mine):
FubukiKai said:
Mods knew and did nothing, nnt claimed to be too distracted to ban or something.
Also reminder that a certain user didn't even get banned once for causing actual massive harm to the site getting a whole category of posts banned. But a few tweets caused by mental issues the user is being treated for, that were specifically meant for us to see and were deleted once we did and were seen by nobody else is way worse ig. The commentary leaves out that important detail. The whole point of that outbreak was to get banned, not to actually cause harm (though to me without context that is what it looked like at first)
Then blindVigil asked who it was, and sinfulPorcupine brought up user #470449 and forum #168913. That incident is what blindVigil was talking about. It is a separate issue brought up to contrast it with this issue.
You are out of the loop or are mistaking users. Paid rewards had nothing to do with this user's specific case.
You know what, who cares? It doesn't matter why he crashed out and started drama stirring. The point is that he isn't responsible for paid rewards being banned.
It literally was. Did you read it? That whole discussion started with paid rewards, and grey's ridiculous scene used them as the focal point of his argument.
You are out of the loop or are mistaking users. Paid rewards had nothing to do with this user's specific case.
It literally was. Did you read it? That whole discussion started with paid rewards, and grey's ridiculous scene used them as the focal point of his argument.
Oh, that guy. I had forgotten about his ridiculous crash out over paid rewards. Why is he being labeled singularly responsible, though? Is it that negative record he got? Cause there was already a discussion on the matter going on when he made that post, which he participated in. Lots of people were in favor of banning paid rewards, myself included (though I don't entirely feel the same now). I always felt that accusation was hyperbolic and misplaced, but maybe more things happened behind the scenes that I wasn't privy to.
