Posted under General
Brightlight said:
I found some of my saved search queries don't work.
For example, I saved the query "shiromanta", and there are certainly some posts uploaded with that tag just a few days ago, but my search:all result does not contain any of them.What kind of information should I provide you to investigate this issue?
Wrong thread. Go to topic #9127.
nonamethanks said:
Are you not aware of the Bookmarklet? The batch one works with twitter multipage posts too, and it will automatically set the source for you.
I've used the single post bookmarklet for quite a while, but for some reason was not aware of the batch and that I could have helped me there.
With the FireFox 57 overhaul and possibly other add-ons, the batch bookmarklet just throws up a blank page with come code.
The simple solution is to use Safari. The single and batch bookmarklets work fine there.
Does post #972563 have the exceptional quality required to be on Danbooru despite being guro? If not could someone please flag it as I already flagged it years ago.
post #2946124 duplicate. I did it again.
tapnek said:
Or use IQDB.
@tapnek
Well, I would agree, but there is issue #3386.
I would like to flag most of pool #8801 for being poorly drawn. Is that OK? I dont want to flood the mod queue and annoy the mods just to have it all get reapproved.
ion288 said:
I would like to flag most of pool #8801 for being poorly drawn. Is that OK? I dont want to flood the mod queue and annoy the mods just to have it all get reapproved.
Flag one to test the water
Make clear in the first flag that you start flagging the rest after the first flag is gone through.
My previous account from 09 got banned for a few months just because I flagged an image that was deleted, but came up again recently. I am just wondering why that would have happened? The images were deleted, but popped up, so I flagged it but got banned this time.
I don't really understand why that would be there case.
Thanks
post #2963911 appears to be a third-party edit if https://www.reddit.com/r/Saber/comments/7iqksr/saber_looks_like_an_angel/dr0nl2k/ is anything to go by. You can tell by the lower corners looking like they were clone-stamped in.
I thought post #2960230 came from the same source, but after looking at it some more, probably not. I do notice something off with the lower right corner though.
Delete post #2974619
I found the original source which was higher res and re-uploaded it as post #2974640
post #2979842
Double-deletion needed.
Provence said:
post #2979842
Double-deletion needed.
Not really. Doragonn chose to re-upload (since the hash of the true image is different) rather than wait for replacement, so the corrupted image is fine as regular-deleted.
RaisingK said:
Not really. Doragonn chose to re-upload (since the hash of the true image is different) rather than wait for replacement, so the corrupted image is fine as regular-deleted.
Nah.
Why should someone have an uneccessary deletion because Pixiv fucked up and maybe Doragonn isn't even aware of that feature.
I guess @Hillside_Moose and @albert already made such double-deletions of corrupted posts, recently.
I screwed up this upload somehow.
Randeel said:
When did the URL recognition for Twitter become this case sensitive?
If you have any upper case letters in the URL in the database it won't recognize what artist it is.
It was fixed for a while but then it caused a regression and was reverted in issue #3422.
