Do not appeal images twice. I think I've seen some of the others appealed more than once too.
Well nobody gave me a reason for why they weren't approved the first time around.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
post #472086 and post #472081 both by akinojo
I can understand if the nude versions of these didn't make it, but I'm kind of puzzled that the safe ones didn't.
jjj14 said: Well nobody gave me a reason for why they weren't approved the first time around.
Quoting from my post just a few posts above yours:
"Remember, this is a thread first and foremost to list your appeals. It is not, necessarily, a feedback thread. You might get feedback if someone wants to give it, but not getting feedback doesn't mean nobody looked at it."
And that's something I've said at least a dozen times through this thread.
Appeals thread, *not* a feedback thread. We can't critique every single image that gets appealed.
I'm getting the feeling that a few people in this thread need to read the about:mod_queue entry again. The whole thing is good to read, but the parts related to this thread would severely cut back on some of the foolish mistakes being made.
There is no clear reason as to why post #480339 was marked for unapproval.
RiderFan said:
There is no clear reason as to why post #480339 was marked for unapproval.
Just as a note that all unapprovals made by non-moderators don't have a visible public reason.
Can the following be reconsidered? Thanks.
Updated
nanami said: * post #482264 (by core_(artist), although I have doubts because of how the swimsuit is drawn)
Core is one of my favorite artists for simple and very cute art of characters I love, but I had to pass over that one (not just in the queue, but when I saw it on pixiv and considered uploading) because I couldn't figure out what was going on with the bottom part of her swimsuit. It just looked really off, which is why I didn't upload or approve it.
CardboardBox said: So, how bout it? No one's responded in 2 days.
Quoting from my post just a few posts above yours, which was quoting from my other post just a few posts above the last person to ask this:
""Quoting from my post just a few posts above yours:
"Remember, this is a thread first and foremost to list your appeals. It is not, necessarily, a feedback thread. You might get feedback if someone wants to give it, but not getting feedback doesn't mean nobody looked at it."
And that's something I've said at least a dozen times through this thread.
Appeals thread, *not* a feedback thread. We can't critique every single image that gets appealed."
I don't see what's wrong with this one at all.
This may be a little late to appeal the deletion of all 28 of my deleted posts, but since I am trying to upload again, and this limits my abilities, well...
The reason that I am even considering appealing the deletion of these posts is that they were all deleted for the reason, "Unapproved in three days" (see http://danbooru.donmai.us/post/index?tags=user%3Athedarkness+status%3Adeleted ). I'm assuming that this means that a moderator simply forgot about them for three days and didn't approve them in time. If this is the case, I ask that careful consideration be given to the posts and whether they should be deleted or not.
Thank you for your consideration, and I hope to have this resolved as soon as possible.
Sorry about assuming the "forgot" thing. I neglected to read about:mod queue before I posted.
Edit: Since they can't be recovered, I was thinking I could re-upload them for the sake of being re-evaluated (at the risk of having them deleted again) but then, the MD5 hash would prevent a re-upload, wouldn't it?
Updated