Was this considered as "poor art"?
Wondering about the reason.
Posted under General
This topic has been locked.
Was this considered as "poor art"?
Wondering about the reason.
Slayze said:
post #458989Was this considered as "poor art"?
Wondering about the reason.
Seemed fine to me, undeleted. As a note though, I tend to hold off on approving stuff with lots of untranslated text since I can't really judge it (and some of the mods are also translators so it's good for them to see it). Perhaps that's why it slipped through.
Please undelete. It is actually pretty well-drawn.
nanami said:
Also, I know game CGs are frowned upon by some, but can the following still be considered? Or are they simply uninteresting?
post #458581
post #441949
They're massively boring. I'd actually go back and kill a lot of already approved game CGs we have, they're worthless for the most part.
Melkior said:
post #458975Please undelete. It is actually pretty well-drawn.
Even aside from the fact it's porn, no. It's not well-drawn, just look at her boobs and chin. That's not how those are attached to the rest of the body in actual humans.
post #458572 - This artist's style is kind of bland to me, but that's one I found interesting, for the idea of Ui in "Don't say lazy" costume.
moyashimon edition
orz
What was wrong with these two? I don't think there's a better CG artist than Kafu, and the second is one of the best colored sketches I've ever seen. Still, if I knew what the problem area was, it could perhaps help me make better uploads in the future. Any insight is welcome.
Thank you
Reason: a lower res version with watermark (this post #87803) was allowed so I think this one should be as well.
Also reposting: post #450631
Scalar said: post #233153
Reason: a lower res version with watermark (this post #87803) was allowed so I think this one should be as well.
Granted I wouldn't be approving either (and the watermarked one was deleted, though perhaps that just happened), but your first link doesn't show up at all for me. The image is just replaced with "deleted".
Also, the watermarked one wasn't "allowed" necessarily, it's just over two years old and from what is now an anon. There was no moderation in place then.
Can the following be reconsidered?
post #459837 (by k_hiro and apart from the panda-like drawing in the background, there's nothing else wrong with it, although I'm doubting this one because of the face)
post #459437 (by yuuyami_sabou and I don't see anything wrong with this one)
post #459343 (by hiya, although I'm also doubting about this one because I can somehow see why this was left unapproved)
Why can't I re-upload it after it has been deleted for being unapproved in three days???
Updated
rehcaerp said:
post # 459093
post # 354031
No space after #. It won't link if you do that,
Why can't I re-upload it after it has been deleted for being unapproved in three days???
Because that's the whole point of deleting things? The system rejects duplicates, and if you could just re-upload already deleted posts at will, having them deleted in the first place would be pointless.
evazion said:
post #459559?
Uh, that should actually be deleted.
rehcaerp said:
Why can't I re-upload it after it has been deleted for being unapproved in three days???
If you can't understand this very basic concept, don't upload anything
evazion said:
post #459559?
EARGH WHAT THE FUCK
Requesting an un-deletion on post #460313
It seems to be a continuation of a K-ON! characters wallpaper motif (same draw-style, patterns, etc.) found in 4 other pictures I uploaded earlier, so I thought including this one would be nice too. Thanks.