pool #1160 and pool #1161 should be combined or something.
Posted under General
pool #1160 and pool #1161 should be combined or something.
pool #1317
Seems to be a tagging accident.
pool #1188
all files deleted
tomato said:
pool #1188
all files deleted
葉月 said:
Again, pools of deleted posts should not be deleted, just marked inactive.
jxh2154 said:
If inactive pools don't show up in pool searches or the pool listing page, then I could sort of support leaving them in. If they're going to clutter things up, then they should just go. If we're deleting the images, we shouldn't care much about how easy they are to navigate. They're not technically supposed to have been on the site at all.
葉月 said:
They don't. So removing the pool makes no sense.
On the contrary, they do. E.g. pool #145 is inactive, but it's right there near the back of the pool listings, and appears when you search: http://danbooru.donmai.us/pool?query=vocalo
Afaik, inactive pool only means it won't show up in the "add to pool" dropdown list on post pages.
EB said:
pool #608This pool seems to be served by the shangrlia_(elf) tag already. I don't really think the _(elf) qualifier is necessary in the tag, either, since shangrlia isn't used for anything, so an alias could be set there.
Maybe someone got it mixed up with Shangrila and thought it'd need one? Aliased to shangrlia.
jxh2154 said:
Maybe someone got it mixed up with Shangrila and thought it'd need one? Aliased to shangrlia.
That's what I'm guessing. The Japanese title makes it look like "Shangrila", but for whatever reason (mistake or intentionally spelling it differently), the official site has it romanized "Shangrlia".
Going back to forum #31499, it seems that we now have have pool #1331 - created by a self-appointed "Comments Czar".
Not that I'm necessarily saying the pool is useless, but do we really need it?
Bapabooiee said: Going back to forum #31499, it seems that we now have have pool #1331 - created by a self-appointed "Comments Czar".
Not that I'm necessarily saying the pool is useless, but do we really need it?
Seems pointless to me. A lot of them just have a lot of replies, and the pool description makes no sense (since the replies are usually about the image).
We shot down this idea once and nothing I'm seeing here is changing my mind. Deleted. The participants can hate me for it later.
pool #1268 - "Touhou - Visions Of The Future"
More or less the same thing as a adult touhou order:score search.
evazion said:
pool #1268 - "Touhou - Visions Of The Future"More or less the same thing as a adult touhou order:score search.
Mmm, yeah, if this were part of some concerted pixiv project I guess I could see it, but as is it's just what you describe, or rather adult touhou fav:a_couple_users.
Thoughts from others on this?
pool #1352 - Comment Combos
Candidate for worst idea ever!
pool #829 - "Reference Works: A pool for images that used another image as a reference"
Pointless since this is covered by the derivative_work tag, plus there's confusion because of the differently defined reference_work tag.
Updated