Donmai

Upload Feedback Thread - post here if your uploads keep getting deleted

Posted under General

argentb

SidBarrett said:

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved? Please give a second chance.

The quality of both of these aren't especially good. 7617298's her anatomy and posture is really odd and the line work is fuzzy. #7613459 is borderline and has good qualities (like the 70s manga style), but it ultimately is a bit below the standards I would want.

35pmachi said:

For once again are they bad or approvers simply don't like it

In my experience, the standards for pornography is held to a higher expectation of quality. A visual depiction of sexual display and acts need to be consider both the content and the artistic representation of what is being shown. All approvers have their own likes and dislikes, and we all are held to an expectation of looking for quality work.

Reply
billb51

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved?
I know that these works are just ordinary drafts, even a little guro.
But these works are only published on the author's twitter feed, and there are no other finished products to share.
Nevertheless, I think the work is of high quality in all aspects from an artistic point of view.
If only because it is not a so-called "high-definition painting", refuse to allow this work to be recorded on this site.
When the artist deletes the paintings, or gets blocked from twitter, no one can see them anymore.
To sum up, I think these works perfectly fit Danbooru's requirements(A repository of high-quality anime-style art and doujinshi.).
Otherwise, these works will just slowly disappear into the Internet.
Please give a second chance.
Thank you.

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399734?q=selece
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399762?q=selece
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399767?q=selece
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399783?q=selece
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399734?q=selece
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8399790?q=selece

Reply
argentb

Shion-art13 said:

Hey everyone, im kinda new here, started to post my work, some of it made it through, some of it didnt, so any feedback would be awesome

Hi! Congratulations on getting your art approved! I doodle periodically myself and can already say that my work wouldn't be approved here so that is quite the achievement ^^

As for feedback, both pieces have good qualities, but they fall a bit short. 8401495 has a very nice pensive expression in the face and I like the quality of the wood wall, but the body portions and positioning are a bit jank. This is especially apparent in the arms and hands, which look a bit disproportionate to her body, awkward and uncomfortable. 8401450 also has a nice face and pretty eyes, but the rest of the art is a bit flat and stiffled. I also noticed that the positioning of the model is a bit off, leaving nearly a third of the upper part of the piece as background.

Still, I am one approver, and if so inclined you could bring these back into the cueue on appeal if you are inclined to do so.

billb51 said:

Hi, any feedback on why these posts weren't approved?
I know that these works are just ordinary drafts, even a little guro.

Err... well, I appreciate and approve of the sentiment of not wanting to see art disappeared for good (it is one of the reasons why I upload myself!) I think that the guro-ness of these pieces are part of the reason why they weren't approved. This type of guro is specific to a particular kind of approver, thus limiting its appeal to a small handful of them... and even those may struggle to approve those as--per your own admission--those are drafts, and very rough ones.

The good news is that even deleted they aren't gone for good. They are just put in a section of danbooru that doesn't get shown in searches. It's actually pretty hard to get stuff permanently removed here.

And if that does not appeal you can, well, appeal! By clicking the appeal for these works you can bring it back into the queue once for reevaluation. Still, I have a feeling that maybe one of these stand a shot of getting through. Good luck if you go this route!

Reply
Shion-art13

argentb said:

Hi! Congratulations on getting your art approved! I doodle periodically myself and can already say that my work wouldn't be approved here so that is quite the achievement ^^

As for feedback, both pieces have good qualities, but they fall a bit short. 8401495 has a very nice pensive expression in the face and I like the quality of the wood wall, but the body portions and positioning are a bit jank. This is especially apparent in the arms and hands, which look a bit disproportionate to her body, awkward and uncomfortable. 8401450 also has a nice face and pretty eyes, but the rest of the art is a bit flat and stiffled. I also noticed that the positioning of the model is a bit off, leaving nearly a third of the upper part of the piece as background.

Still, I am one approver, and if so inclined you could bring these back into the cueue on appeal if you are inclined to do so.

Thanks i was really happy to see some of them were approved, this is very helpful, composition and perspective are things i struggle with a lot, same goes for making the pose looks natural, i will try to improve them in the future, im trying to look for a teacher cause i think there are some things i wont be able to learn on my own

Reply
billb51

argentb said:

Hi! Congratulations on getting your art approved! I doodle periodically myself and can already say that my work wouldn't be approved here so that is quite the achievement ^^

As for feedback, both pieces have good qualities, but they fall a bit short. 8401495 has a very nice pensive expression in the face and I like the quality of the wood wall, but the body portions and positioning are a bit jank. This is especially apparent in the arms and hands, which look a bit disproportionate to her body, awkward and uncomfortable. 8401450 also has a nice face and pretty eyes, but the rest of the art is a bit flat and stiffled. I also noticed that the positioning of the model is a bit off, leaving nearly a third of the upper part of the piece as background.

Still, I am one approver, and if so inclined you could bring these back into the cueue on appeal if you are inclined to do so.

Err... well, I appreciate and approve of the sentiment of not wanting to see art disappeared for good (it is one of the reasons why I upload myself!) I think that the guro-ness of these pieces are part of the reason why they weren't approved. This type of guro is specific to a particular kind of approver, thus limiting its appeal to a small handful of them... and even those may struggle to approve those as--per your own admission--those are drafts, and very rough ones.

The good news is that even deleted they aren't gone for good. They are just put in a section of danbooru that doesn't get shown in searches. It's actually pretty hard to get stuff permanently removed here.

And if that does not appeal you can, well, appeal! By clicking the appeal for these works you can bring it back into the queue once for reevaluation. Still, I have a feeling that maybe one of these stand a shot of getting through. Good luck if you go this route!

Hi argentb, thank you very much for your reply.

I don't think I'm going to appeal.

I think this site only accepts "high quality" paintings for upload.

I originally thought that the site itself, with its "sketch" and "guro" tag options, should be able to accept this kind of content, but it turns out I was mistaken.

The original plan was to upload the works of "藍川とうま" after the review. Since he has deleted all his PIXIV and TWITTER content, I wanted to share my saved image here.

However, compared with popular artists, his drawings may not be considered "high quality". I think his style will not please the preferences of the auditor, and the auditor may not approve his works to be entered into this website, so I choose to give up.

I hope the review system of this website can be more tolerant, I saw some of the previous posts of the work is very normal and rejected. In fact, the paintings of popular painters do not need to be saved at all, if only the works of popular painters are accepted, then some other relatively unpopular excellent works or themes will gradually disappear, perhaps this is the law of the jungle.

In addition, if the site does not actually allow the "sketch" and "guro" tag, in fact, the site can remove these tag.

Finally, thanks again to argentb, I am glad that you as the auditor can reply me.

Reply
35pmachi

https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8413873?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8409601?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8409754?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8409942?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8409947?q=user%3A35pmachi+status%3Apending
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/8383987?q=status%3Adeleted+user%3A35pmachi

Stuff in the queue hell (again). Even smth that looks like it should be approved with high quality at the first glance got ignored. I'm amazed by that (no).

Reply
1 437 438 439 440 441 442