Donmai

Do we need Classic Sonic characters?

Posted under Tags

BUR #39033 is pending approval.

create alias classic_amy -> amy_rose

Separate one for Amy since she actually does have a different design with a green and orange color combo. For the record I still think this is unneeded and easily replicated with a search of the classic Sonic copytag.

I'm generally pro-costume tagging and I think these (barring Classic Sonic) are incredibly superfluous. While you will get some unrelated results from the chartag + copytag search, most of the results will be the classic variants.

And yeah, besides Amy the difference is minimal.

BUR #39034 is pending approval.

remove implication sonic_the_hedgehog_(riders) -> sonic_the_hedgehog
remove implication knuckles_the_echidna_(riders) -> knuckles_the_echidna
remove implication tails_(riders)_(sonic) -> tails_(sonic)
remove implication shadow_the_hedgehog_(riders) -> shadow_the_hedgehog
remove implication silver_the_hedgehog_(riders) -> silver_the_hedgehog
nuke sonic_the_hedgehog_(riders)
nuke knuckles_the_echidna_(riders)
nuke tails_(riders)_(sonic)
nuke shadow_the_hedgehog_(riders)
nuke silver_the_hedgehog_(riders)

On a related note, these have been bothering me for a while. I was very adamant about not wanting these when I originally started doing Sonic costumes and they got made anyways.

The male characters in Sonic Riders literally only get eyewear and slightly different shoes at most. People always forget to tag these. At least the girls get actual unique outfits that appear in other media. These are nothing.

BUR #39038 is pending approval.

nuke sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)
create implication classic_sonic -> sonic_the_hedgehog
create implication classic_tails -> tails_(sonic)
create implication classic_knuckles -> knuckles_the_echidna
create implication classic_amy -> amy_rose
create implication classic_eggman -> dr._eggman
create implication classic_espio -> espio_the_chameleon
create implication classic_vector -> vector_the_crocodile
create implication classic_charmy -> charmy_bee

We do need Classic characters because Classic Sonic (and friends) and Modern Sonic (and friends) are canonically different characters that won't stop bumping into each other.

The sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) tag is ambiguous as to what it’s even trying to achieve. Is it just for images referencing an old game? Every individual game already has a copyright tag. Is it just for images that depict Classic Sonic, the character? Then Classic Sonic should be a character tag. As of now, sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) is being used to tag images depicting events and settings from old games without Classic Sonic and friends appearing, as well as tagging new fanart for new games with Classic Sonic and friends but no references to games “pre-Dreamcast era”.

There actually was a discussion in the Discord about this, I was going to make a Topic about it and… forgot.

Discussion begins around https://discord.com/channels/310432830138089472/710192137878241372/1349887856612737137 but I'll just reiterate it here.

The consensus at the time was to do the exact opposite of what you’re doing, and nuking the sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) copyright tag. It’s completely arbitrary and I'm confused as to what its purpose even is. It doesn’t accomplish anything that individual game copyright tags don’t already do, aside from presumably preventing the creation of individual character tags.

As it stands, if I look up “character" + “sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)” there is no guarantee I will see the character design I'm looking for. Searching for “sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)” + “amy_rose” will get me this:

post #7757504
But Classic Amy is nowhere to be seen.

post #5323369
Same issue for the same query. Classic Sonic being babied by Modern Amy.

post #7734773
The “sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)” tag is only there because Mighty and Fang are there, everyone has their modern designs.

post #8919683
That's Modern Sonic and Modern Knuckles, but it gets the Classic tag because this is referencing the S&K title screen

post #7757322
Technically anything referencing the old games gets the classic tag, these are all the main timeline Modern counterparts

post #3572169
This image has 50 character tags. It's tagged sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic). Good luck trying to find why that tag is there without bringing out a fine-toothed comb to find Classic Sonic and Classic Eggman amongst the 50 of them.

Examples of Classic Sonic and Modern Sonic together being visually distinct. To someone not in the fandom, it would be easy to confuse Classic Sonic as Modern Sonic's son.
post #8186618
post #7968645
post #7757549
post #4342593
post #6596142
post #8973811
post #1827285
post #8973811

Japanese artists also like to infantilize Classic Sonic, for whatever reason.

Classic Amy and Modern Amy look more like sisters than they do the same character. Aside from being “girl” and “pink” they're entirely different. If they looked identical, the outfit alone would warrant a separate tag.

post #6426585
post #6442661
post #6788342
post #7346154

Classic Sonic, Classic Tails, Classic Knuckles, Classic Amy, and Classic Eggman have been canonically established as being entirely separate characters from their Modern counterparts, particularly since Sonic Generations all the way back in 2011, and Sonic Forces, in which it's revealed that they're from a different dimension than the main cast. They appear in new games alongside their Modern counterparts (e.g., Sonic Generations, Sonic Dash, Sonic Runners, Sonic Forces, Sonic Speed Simulator). The sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) tag, by its own definition, should not be applied to these new appearances, creating a contradiction.

The argument that we don't tag different versions of characters like Chun-Li from different Street Fighter games is not applicable. Those are iterative designs of the same character. Classic Sonic and Modern Sonic are treated as distinct entities within the Sonic canon and are visually distinct from one another. Our tagging should reflect this. Gacha games provide more relevant precedents.

Also, these guys exist: post #6546873

Updated

But you're cherry picking examples. The vast majority of sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) amy_rose is Classic Amy. You don't need a whole new character tag to avoid a small number of outliers.

The Classic copytag covers the pre-Dreamcast games and the universe that spawned from it.

No one's arguing against Classic Sonic being considered his own character, by the way. The original BUR leaves him out for a reason.

Updated

Trouble_Windows said:

But you're cherry picking examples. The vast majority of sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) amy_rose is Classic Amy. You don't need a whole new character tag to avoid a small number of outliers.

sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) amy_rose -classic_amy

46 posts is not a small number of outliers.

[deleted]

Classic Knuckles is in Sonic Speed Simulator. "Classic Espio" has not ever been referred to by that name, but I can concede to not let him get his own tag until he gets an explicit namedrop.

Updated

@KalpacMuskoxen thank you for responding.

We do need Classic characters because Classic Sonic (and friends) and Modern Sonic (and friends) are canonically different characters that won't stop bumping into each other.

I think that Classic Sonic is a good tag and left him out because of this! The character has been running into the cast since Generations and is established as his own thing.

The sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic) tag is ambiguous as to what it’s even trying to achieve. Is it just for images referencing an old game? Every individual game already has a copyright tag. Is it just for images that depict Classic Sonic, the character? Then Classic Sonic should be a character tag. As of now.

Another thing we agree on, in fact I'd go a step beyond, I think Generations, Forces, and depictions that only include "Classic Sonic" should be removed from this tag and it should be reworked into only being for the 16bit titles.

Also, these guys exist: post #6546873

This point actually shoots your other one in the foot because Link and friends aren't canon-tagged based on if they are the same person. With very few exceptions like Oot to Majora every Link is a different person. Toon Link is encompassing canonically 6 different people. They are grouped because they are visually distinct, I don't think Classic Espio is visually distinct from regular Espio, or Classic Charmy is visually distinct from regular Charmy.

If the Sonic the Hedgehog (Classic) tag was cleaned up to remove modern titles with the exception of Mania would you agree these tags are redundant with it?

zetsubousensei said:

@KalpacMuskoxen thank you for responding.

I think that Classic Sonic is a good tag and left him out because of this! The character has been running into the cast since Generations and is established as his own thing.

Another thing we agree on, in fact I'd go a step beyond, I think Generations, Forces, and depictions that only include "Classic Sonic" should be removed from this tag and it should be reworked into only being for the 16bit titles.

This point actually shoots your other one in the foot because Link and friends aren't canon-tagged based on if they are the same person. With very few exceptions like Oot to Majora every Link is a different person. Toon Link is encompassing canonically 6 different people. They are grouped because they are visually distinct, I don't think Classic Espio is visually distinct from regular Espio, or Classic Charmy is visually distinct from regular Charmy.

If the Sonic the Hedgehog (Classic) tag was cleaned up to remove modern titles with the exception of Mania would you agree these tags are redundant with it?

I appreciate the points about Espio and Charmy, and I can concede on those specific characters for now, as their Classic designs lack significant visual distinction. However, I strongly disagree that the proposed cleanup of the "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)" tag makes separate character tags redundant, particularly for characters like Classic Amy and Classic Eggman.

My argument isn't primarily about canon or lore; it's about visual distinctiveness and ease of searching. While I'm not familiar with the Legend of Zelda series, the existence of separate tags for Toon Link, Young Link, and Link supports my point. These tags exist because the characters are visually distinct, regardless of their relationships within the game's lore. They allow users to easily find images of specific character designs. Similarly, Classic Amy and Classic Eggman have drastically different appearances from their modern counterparts. A user searching for Classic Amy's specific green and orange color scheme and distinct design shouldn't have to sift through images of Modern Amy.

Trouble_Windows said:

It's not about the number. It's about the fact that if you look at the search I linked, it is predominantly Classic Amy. Most pages will be almost entirely Classic Amy with a couple other posts. You aren't dredging through pages and pages of unrelated images to find her.

The issue isn't just about the proportion of Classic Amy images in a mixed search; it's about the precision and reliability of the search itself. Using the fan-made "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)" tag, which, by its own wiki definition, is intended to encompass a nine-year period of games, animated series (but, notably, not comics or manga, for whatever reason), and even modern games using the classic art style, introduces significant ambiguity. This tag, as currently used, does not guarantee that a Classic character even appears in the image.

This inconsistency is further highlighted by your own previous forum post (forum #316734):

Trouble Windows 5 months ago
BUR #33024 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication knuckles_(series) -> sonic_(live_action)
create implication sonic_spinball -> sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)
create implication dr._robotnik's_mean_bean_machine -> adventures_of_sonic_the_hedgehog

Knuckles is a series in the Live Action Sonic universe, and Sonic Spinball is a classic era game. Plus another missing implication - I don't think Bean Machine should imply Classic given its circumstances.

Updated 5 months ago

Here, you argued that Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine should not be implied by "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)", despite it falling within the pre-Dreamcast era and being a tie-in to Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, a title explicitly listed in the "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)" wiki entry. This demonstrates the inherent subjectivity and lack of a firm, official definition for the tag, leading to exceptions and inconsistencies. We're making individual exceptions based on debatable interpretations of an arbitrary, user-defined term.

The goal of tagging is to facilitate accurate and efficient searching. Separate character tags for visually distinct designs, using their official names (like Classic Amy and Classic Eggman), provide a much higher degree of certainty and eliminate the need for users to understand the nuances and exceptions of a broad, fan-created category tag. This aligns with Danbooru's general approach to tagging visually distinct character designs in gacha games and other franchises, as previously outlined by site staff.

This inconsistency is further highlighted by your own previous forum post (forum #316734):

Here, you argued that Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine should not be implied by "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)", despite it falling within the pre-Dreamcast era and being a tie-in to Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, a title explicitly listed in the "sonic_the_hedgehog_(classic)" wiki entry. This demonstrates the inherent subjectivity and lack of a firm, official definition for the tag, leading to exceptions and inconsistencies. We're making individual exceptions based on debatable interpretations of an arbitrary, user-defined term.

I don't currently have the energy to reply to this in full, my apologies, but I did want to reply to this point: the reason I didn't imply Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine to the Classic tag is because it's a reskinned Puyopuyo, and we chose to imply it to the series it was a tie-in for instead.

I'm also not sure why the Classic wiki includes the cartoon spinoffs, they're not implied to it and usually don't get tagged with it. I don't think they should be there, I've always seen them as their own thing.

Trouble_Windows said:

I'm also not sure why the Classic wiki includes the cartoon spinoffs, they're not implied to it and usually don't get tagged with it. I don't think they should be there, I've always seen them as their own thing.

It was added at one point and that's it. Heero, when he changed the implications for the classic games in topic #26558, delibarely ignored the cartoons listed because "I don't know enough about how SEGA classifies these games and adaptations to know if they're officially considered part of the classic series." He also didn't include Sonic Mania, but that got changed by someone else in forum #305971.

Also, let's not forget that, just like Kalp making these chartags, Zettamorose and mortalkombatchan also made Sonic the Hedgehog (Classic) without discussion.

Damian0358 said:

It was added at one point and that's it. Heero, when he changed the implications for the classic games in topic #26558, delibarely ignored the cartoons listed because "I don't know enough about how SEGA classifies these games and adaptations to know if they're officially considered part of the classic series." He also didn't include Sonic Mania, but that got changed by someone else in forum #305971.

Also, let's not forget that, just like Kalp making these chartags, Zettamorose and mortalkombatchan also made Sonic the Hedgehog (Classic) without discussion.

Not meaning to be pedantic, but I didn't even create the original Classic character tags, I was simply repopulating old tags that already existed and expanding to include other characters. @klorpa created the Classic Sonic tag back in 2021, and @M28 made both the Classic Eggman and Classic Amy tags in 2023.

@mortalkombachan went rogue and untagged hundreds of these posts that were being gardened by multiple dedicated taggers without any forum discussion whatsoever.

Damian0358 said:
Also, let's not forget that, just like Kalp making these chartags, Zettamorose and mortalkombatchan also made Sonic the Hedgehog (Classic) without discussion.

@Damian0358 Your accusation that I made the Sonic the hedgehog (classic) is false. The tag already existed and I tagged posts at the time accordingly, so users could easily search posts that depict any classic Sonic games or classic artstyle. It's been quite some time since I've interacted with Sonic posts.

KalpacMuskoxen said:

@mortalkombachan went rogue and untagged hundreds of these posts that were being gardened by multiple dedicated taggers without any forum discussion whatsoever.

@KalpacMuskoxen I deleted the tags at that time, yes, roughly two years ago, but saying I went rogue is quite a stretch, don't you think? The tags were created by an user named M28 and not "multiple dedicated taggers", and without forum discussion. I also explained privately to said user that those character tags were not necessary, with Sonic the hedgehog (classic) tag around, having in mind discussion that had that agreement in topic #23464, when we also deleted tags such as Chun-Li (SF6) and Cammy White (SF6), and that they're free and encouraged to discuss the topic in forums but these points would inevitably be brought up again. And, Classic Sonic is just, younger Sonic, according to Sonic Generations. If there's an agreement that Classic Sonic character tags should exist I'll simply accept it, but for now most seem to agree that these tags are unnecessary still, as per the voting in BUR #39032.

Updated

mortalkombachan said:

@Damian0358 Your accusation that I made the Sonic the hedgehog (classic) is false. The tag already existed and I tagged posts at the time accordingly, so users could easily search posts that depict any classic Sonic games or classic artstyle. It's been quite some time since I've interacted with Sonic posts.

That's why I said you and Zettamorose. The post history for the tag makes it abundantly clear - Zetta actually created the tag in January 2021, starting with 35 posts and making its wiki, but you decided to enable its existence later in the summer by adding 51 posts as well as implying the tag in topic #16889 and continuously iterating on its wiki. Even after the tag took off by itself, you remained the most prominent tagger for the tag until 2023. The post history doesn't lie, you're just as culpable for the tag's existence as Zetta.

Damian0358 said:

That's why I said you and Zettamorose. The post history for the tag makes it abundantly clear - Zetta actually created the tag in January 2021, starting with 35 posts and making its wiki, but you decided to enable its existence later in the summer by adding 51 posts as well as implying the tag in topic #16889 and continuously iterating on its wiki. Even after the tag took off by itself, you remained the most prominent tagger for the tag until 2023. The post history doesn't lie, you're just as culpable for the tag's existence as Zetta.

You said I created the tag when I factually did not to prove some narrative. You're making it sound like was some mastermind behind the tag, when I simply tagged it accordingly when it existed. It's not that deep. You mention topic #16889 and it was just implying all Sonic copyright tags with more than 50 posts at the time to the main copyright tag. Not some mastermind move at all. If I was the most prominent tagger at the time it was simply because I made the effort to correctly tag the remaining posts so users could easily search for Classic games/Classic art Sonic in the sea of Sonic posts, years ago. I don't even engage much with these posts for a good time, mostly doing approver work.
If you think that tag's existence was a grand mistake you can just make another topic with a BUR for it to be deprecated and nuked and move on.

mortalkombachan said:

You said I created the tag when I factually did not to prove some narrative. You're making it sound like was some mastermind behind the tag, when I simply tagged it accordingly when it existed. It's not that deep. You mention topic #16889 and it was just implying all Sonic copyright tags with more than 50 posts at the time to the main copyright tag. Not some mastermind move at all. If I was the most prominent tagger at the time it was simply because I made the effort to correctly tag the remaining posts so users could easily search for Classic games/Classic art Sonic in the sea of Sonic posts, years ago. I don't even engage much with these posts for a good time, mostly doing approver work.
If you think that tag's existence was a grand mistake you can just make another topic with a BUR for it to be deprecated and nuked and move on.

I didn't say that you were some mastermind orchestrating the tag's existence, I'm just saying you arbitrarily allowed the tag to exist without bringing it forth for further discussion. The only reason why the tag had more than 50 posts was because of your action, and the first time the tag was ever discussed in the forum was in topic #16889. You just didn't think about the consequences the tag might have, it's just like the time when Kalp tried to imply the useless team fortress (series) tag in a Mario copytag implication thread, topic #18534, not because he was trying to sneak it past in a big BUR to fool everyone, but because he was too lazy to make another BUR for it.

Regardless of whether or not that tag's existence was a "grand mistake," its existence came about in the same way as the chartags this thread is about - without any proper discussion whether or not they should exist in the first place, and the fact it exists now directly disallows Kalp's chartags to exist. So either the copytag lives or the chartags live - both products of a lack of discussion - they can't both exist.

1 2