Imply large wings -> wings

BUR #38063 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication large_wings -> wings

It is a large wings.

What a useless tag its better to just get rid of it

Gal12870 said:

What a useless tag its better to just get rid of it

I disagree, though I think a lot of the art in it right now is questionable, post #8923343 and post #8893219 are the kinds of images I'd expect from the tag but a lot of it is just slightly larger than usual or not at all like post #8968984

zetsubousensei said:

I disagree, though I think a lot of the art in it right now is questionable, post #8923343 and post #8893219 are the kinds of images I'd expect from the tag but a lot of it is just slightly larger than usual or not at all like post #8968984

You could rename it to huge_wings and garden all the normal stuff out.

I agree with zetsubousensei, I could see the use of having a tag for wings much larger than the body they belong to.

zetsubousensei said:

I disagree, though I think a lot of the art in it right now is questionable, post #8923343 and post #8893219 are the kinds of images I'd expect from the tag but a lot of it is just slightly larger than usual or not at all like post #8968984

I agree with you i said what i said because i also saw post #8968984 (the last one you tagged) and figured since barely anyone knows about the tag and people are misusing it anyway its better to just get rid of it

Large wings are a very taggable concept. We should only get rid of tags when they're beyond saving but that shouldn't be a point in this conversation to begin with because it's not technically wrong for big and/or low wings to be wings themselves.

As AngryZapdos said, the tag could use a name change. (I suggest oversized_wings.) Right now it's spammed on Blue Archive posts for no other reason than it's "technically" large, when you should be asking is if it's "proportional".

BUR #39094 is pending approval.

create alias large_wings -> oversized_wings

As above

The bulk update request #38063 (forum #339474) has been approved by @nonamethanks.