Posted under Tags
BUR #36502 is pending approval.
mass update pool:20887 -> juxtaposition
nuke pool:20887
The pool #20887 (Characters and Their Own Depictions) is basically just a NSFW version of juxtaposition. Given their redundancy and lack of distinction, I suppose we should merge them into the tag.
it appears the pool is also intended for situations where the picture of the character is not that different from their regular appearance, given the first line of the pool wiki states as follows:
Self-explanatory: Posts with a character and any object (picture, poster, photo, etc) depicting said character.
outside of that, i do agree with turning this pool into a tag or folding it into an already existing one
sinning said:
it appears the pool is also intended for situations where the picture of the character is not that different from their regular appearance, given the first line of the pool wiki states as follows:
outside of that, i do agree with turning this pool into a tag or folding it into an already existing one
I do think that the current description of juxtaposition wiki is quite misleading, as it is not always has to be NSFW or sexual. So maybe that could be changed after the merge.
This pool has always gotten on my nerves. I have no idea why it's a pool when it's an objectively taggable situation with juxtaposition. I don't see a point for it to exist.
This should be a tag, but it shouldn't all be dumped into juxtaposition. Juxtaposition is about a sharp contrast in depictions, not just any time a character is seen with their own depiction. There's no contrast in something like post #8472998 or post #8606712.
evazion said:
This should be a tag, but it shouldn't all be dumped into juxtaposition. Juxtaposition is about a sharp contrast in depictions, not just any time a character is seen with their own depiction. There's no contrast in something like post #8472998 or post #8606712.
character_and_character_object?
And imply the various character_doll, character_charm, etc into a character_object umbrella tag
EDIT:
topic #30519 for the creation of character_object
Updated
evazion's examples are, in-universe, 3d objects (figurines, charms, plushies), yes, but i think it should also apply to objects like photos, posters, televisions displaying the character, and so on... i don't think a tv can be called a character object just because it displays a character
