Pokémon form implications

BUR #35622 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication gimmighoul_(chest) -> gimmighoul
create implication gimmighoul_(roaming) -> gimmighoul

I noticed Gimmighoul was one of the only Pokémon with multiple forms, but only one tag. I created tags for both of its forms, but the implications still need to be created.

BUR #35627 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication basculegion_(male) -> basculegion
create implication basculegion_(female) -> basculegion
create implication squawkabilly_(green) -> squawkabilly
create implication squawkabilly_(blue) -> squawkabilly
create implication squawkabilly_(yellow) -> squawkabilly
create implication squawkabilly_(white) -> squawkabilly
create implication dudunsparce_(two-segment) -> dudunsparce
create implication dudunsparce_(three-segment) -> dudunsparce

I also created tags for the alternate forms of Basculegion, Squawkabilly, and Dudunsparce, all of which need implications created as well.

The bulk update request #35627 (forum #331078) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #35622 (forum #331059) has been approved by @evazion.