Posted under Tags
BUR #33656 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication kasane_teto_(halloween) -> kasane_teto
create implication sister_teto -> kasane_teto
create implication kasane_neko_(haru57928031) -> kasane_teto
So, they are kasane teto varation. only that (the other BUR request that I did has a lot of mistake)
Updated
For what it's worth, you can just edit BURs if you made a mistake and ideally before anyone else has voted on it. You can also make a fixed BUR to contain discussion to one topic by using "Request alias/implication" with the topic open. It's not a big deal making a new topic but thought you should know about those options.
Previous topic in question: topic #29533
...what about sister teto posts without teto? like post #8519773?
Shibi said:
...what about sister teto posts without teto? like post #8519773?
Cross-category implications can't even be done.
It was a character tag until presumably just a few hours ago. If this is a song, it should have a qualifier as well.
luntoer said:
It was a character tag until presumably just a few hours ago. If this is a song, it should have a qualifier as well.
I changed it back to a character tag. It doesn't seem to be a full vocal synth song but just a single piece of sung dialogue. The wiki has been updated with an explanation.
Feel free to contest this since there does seem to be parodies with other copyrights that use the "song".
Updated
BUR #34301 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication assistant_teto -> kasane_teto
create implication bishoujo_detective_zundamon -> zundamon
Also while I'm here, recent derivatives that need to be implied to their parents.
luntoer said:
I changed it back to a character tag. It doesn't seem to be a full vocal synth song but just a single piece of sung dialogue. The wiki has been updated with an explanation.
Feel free to contest this since there does seem to be parodies with other copyrights that use the "song".
the solution is to pay the artist to make a full song to justify a copytag
The bulk update request #33656 (forum #318934) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
luntoer said:
BUR #34301 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication assistant_teto -> kasane_teto
create implication bishoujo_detective_zundamon -> zundamonAlso while I'm here, recent derivatives that need to be implied to their parents.
Why assistant_teto -> kasane_teto_(sv) ? They don't look visually similar enough that we need three layers of chartags.
The bulk update request #34301 (forum #321595) has been approved by @evazion.
