shadowverse related implications

BUR #32960 has been rejected.

create implication shadowverse_evolve -> shadowverse
create implication shadowverse_(animated_series) -> shadowverse
create implication shadowverse_flame -> shadowverse
create implication shadowverse_(anime) -> shadowverse
create implication shadowverse_flame -> shadowverse_(animated_series)
create implication shadowverse_(anime) -> shadowverse_(animated_series)

all of these are under the shadowverse copyright

shadowverse_flame and shadowverse_(anime) are the second and first seasons respectively of the animated series

actually, now that i think about it, does the shadowverse_(animated_series) tag need to even exist?

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #32960 (forum #315929) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

if these implications are not correct, then are there a better set of implications to use here?

These lines are redundant:

create implication shadowverse_flame -> shadowverse
create implication shadowverse_(anime) -> shadowverse

If you're implying these to shadowverse_(animated_series), you don't need to imply them to shadowverse in separate lines because you have this line:

create implication shadowverse_(animated_series) -> shadowverse

Implying these tags to both shadowverse and shadowverse_(animated_series) could make them show up in a post's tag list multiple times. No more than one of each tag should be present in the tag list.