BUR #32845 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
remove implication parvati_(fate) -> matou_sakura
Previously proposed & rejected several years ago in forum #183038. I think it's worth revisiting again because unlike Muramasa implying Shirou which seems to be a weird grandfathered-in case (see forum #207482), this just feels like an inconsistent oversight. Other pseudo-servants with implications to their original, like Caren Hortensia (Amor Caren) and Manannan mac Lir appear in-game with the same costumes as their original counterparts and clearly identify as such, whereas Parvati clearly considers herself a separate entity to Matou Sakura (much like with Ishtar and Sitonai).