Posted under Tags
BUR #32768 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
deprecate light_brown_background
Come on. Why do we need this? Just looking at the first page alone at the moment, most of these aren't even brown. I even spotted post #8273536 in there...As if the hair situation ain't bad enough...
zetsubousensei said:
Beige_background 2.0.
Maybe they'll try taupe_background next... pale_brown_background, perhaps... :BlobThinkingGlare:
And before that tan background and related tags. Always an attempt at fucking "off-brown" without fail for some reason with these bad color tags. I don't know why. Especially since they always go horribly wrong almost immediately.
Knowledge_Seeker said:
And before that tan background and related tags. Always an attempt at fucking "off-brown" without fail for some reason with these bad color tags. I don't know why. Especially since they always go horribly wrong almost immediately.
The wiki for tan background actually directs people to use light brown instead, so that ought to be updated. Should the same list of alternatives from beige background be good?
Yeah. In fact, looking at tan background is what prompted me to make this BUR, seeing that tag there as opposed to, say, brown background.
I've updated the tan background wiki.
WeakestUploader said:
What I've learned from the past few weeks is that taggers love colours to everyone else's detriment.
Feels like half the time the colors are wrong too. But that's probably because their color judgment is subjective and mine is objective, and everyone else's color perception needs to move to match mine. (joking but also how does post #8325893 have a purple dress)
The bulk update request #32768 (forum #312040) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
