BUR #31027 has been rejected.
create implication side-tie_peek -> side-tie_panties
even if they're not fully visible, the panties are still there we presume
Posted under Tags
BUR #31027 has been rejected.
create implication side-tie_peek -> side-tie_panties
even if they're not fully visible, the panties are still there we presume
Does this tag apply to side-tie_bikini_bottoms at all?
zetsubousensei said:
Does this tag apply to side-tie_bikini_bottoms at all?
I would think so
I wasn't aware of this tag but I'd assume it applies to (and/or is difficult to distinguish from) side-tie bikini bottoms.
岩戸鈴芽 said:
I wasn't aware of this tag but I'd assume it applies to (and/or is difficult to distinguish from) side-tie bikini bottoms.
Don't forget the occasional side-tie_leotard.
The bulk update request #31027 (forum #305425) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.