Cooperative_* tags

BUR #30502 has been rejected.

create implication cooperative_fellatio -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_paizuri -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_handjob -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_grinding -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_footjob -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_buttjob -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_breast_smother -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_hairjob -> teamwork_(sexual)
create implication cooperative_fingering -> teamwork_(sexual)

I've been working on moving all of the cooperative_* tags from the teamwork tag to the teamwork (sexual) tag to separate both sexual and mundane teamworks. The old teamwork tag is now only used for actual teamwork outside sexual contexts. The new sexual teamwork tag would serve as the umbrella tag for any cooperative sexual position.

We already have a tag for sexual teamwork, it's called threesome.

nonamethanks said:

We already have a tag for sexual teamwork, it's called threesome.

It's not just always threesome, a lot of images involve harem with three or more girls.

Fenton said:

It's not just always threesome, a lot of images involve harem with three or more girls.

So group sex?

nonamethanks said:

So group sex?

I guess but it has something to do with the taker being dominated by those people, who work together to make them cum.

Fenton said:

I guess but it has something to do with the taker being dominated by those people, who work together to make them cum.

Teamwork implies intent, while threesome/group_sex only describe the number of participants.

There are probably some predicament_bondage images that have sexual teamwork with a team of 2.

wakaba_hiiro said:

Teamwork implies intent, while threesome/group_sex only describe the number of participants.

There are probably some predicament_bondage images that have sexual teamwork with a team of 2.

There is also Blue Plate Special (sex) that may counts as teamwork as well.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #30502 (forum #302790) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

May I get an explanation why this got rejected?

BUR #34707 is pending approval.

create alias teamwork_(sexual) -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_fellatio -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_paizuri -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_handjob -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_grinding -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_footjob -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_buttjob -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_breast_smother -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_hairjob -> group_sex
create implication cooperative_fingering -> group_sex

Alright, restarting this BUR, this time aliasing teamwork (sexual) to group sex. Since, not all cooperative actions are related to threesome like post #8505495 and post #8267556.

The "teamwork" tag was fine, in my opinion.
I agree with what wakaba_hiiro said - teamwork isn't just "group sex"; it specifically refers to participants simultaneously performing the same action on another party.

hdk5 said:

The "teamwork" tag was fine, in my opinion.
I agree with what wakaba_hiiro said - teamwork isn't just "group sex"; it specifically refers to participants simultaneously performing the same action on another party.

Well, this BUR serves as an alternative to the one that got rejected despite having many upvotes. Well, I guess it's worth to try again.