alias glaze_artifacts -> adversarial_noise

BUR #30476 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias glaze_artifacts -> adversarial_noise
create alias has_glazed_revision -> has_adversarial_noise_revision

Broader name. Nightshade is similar to Glaze and has been available to download since January. Recently, Clip Studio Paint released an update allowing artists to apply a "noise pattern" to their work as a faster alternative to Glaze (Glaze needs a good GPU to run, and is slow to process multiple images).

I don't see the reason to have separate meta tags like nightshade artifacts and clip studio paint noise. I don't like the idea of all these posts under the glaze artifacts tag, like what we are doing with the jpeg artifacts tag being applied to videos and other filetypes (see topic #24123).

HyphenSam said:

BUR #30476 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create alias glaze_artifacts -> adversarial_noise
create alias has_glazed_revision -> has_adversarial_noise_revision

Broader name. Nightshade is similar to Glaze and has been available to download since January. Recently, Clip Studio Paint released an update allowing artists to apply a "noise pattern" to their work as a cheaper alternative to Glaze.

I don't see the reason to have separate meta tags like nightshade artifacts and clip studio paint noise.

I hate this name simply as a tag name but there definitely should just be one tag for them all, no point in distinguishing. Without a better name this'll do though.

I don't like the idea of all these posts under the glaze artifacts tag, like what we are doing with the jpeg artifacts tag being applied to videos and other filetypes (see topic #24123).

We are what.

Related, I notice that a lot of people cannot distinguish jpeg artifacts, glaze artifacts, upscaling artifacts, etc., and just pick a random one and always use that one. These tags are rife with mistags.

岩戸鈴芽 said:

I hate this name simply as a tag name but there definitely should just be one tag for them all, no point in distinguishing. Without a better name this'll do though.

I picked this specific name because I saw it used in This Github repo, and thought it was a good descriptive name. If there are any better names then please leave some suggestions.

HyphenSam said:

I picked this specific name because I saw it used in This Github repo, and thought it was a good descriptive name. If there are any better names then please leave some suggestions.

perturbation_effect ? We probably want something that people that skim read/ not thinking wont accidentally find and go "oh noise"

Artxe said:

perturbation_effect ? We probably want something that people that skim read/ not thinking wont accidentally find and go "oh noise"

I think that's a bit too "correct" to the point where it's not an ideal tagname. Calling it adversarial noise at least isn't wrong (you can describe a lot of things as noise in one way or another), and people will find a way to misuse the tag regardless.

The bulk update request #30476 (forum #301783) has been approved by @nonamethanks.