Imply multiple unit train

BUR #30338 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication multiple_unit_train -> train

In case this tag is worth keeping.

I said this on Discord too when it was created, but if we have electric_locomotive and diesel_locomotive, why should we have one tag for DMUs and EMUs (no Vera not the bird)? The differences and identifiers are basically the same (overhead lines, exhaust fumes, pantograph).

岩戸鈴芽 said:

I said this on Discord too when it was created, but if we have electric_locomotive and diesel_locomotive, why should we have one tag for DMUs and EMUs (no Vera not the bird)? The differences and identifiers are basically the same (overhead lines, exhaust fumes, pantograph).

I don't think the difference is always as obvious as you're making it out to be.

Diesel Multiple Units: post #2632686 (KiHa 54 series), post #2346402 (KiHa 5500 series), post #1671310 (KiHa 100 series)
Electric Multiple Units: post #7243846 (209 series), post #8016262 (E235 series), post #1389725 (103 series), Wikipedia Example (British Rail Class 442, uses third rail for electricity)

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #30338 (forum #299729) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #30338 (forum #299729) has been approved by @nonamethanks.