iPod Classic

BUR #29593 has been rejected.

create implication ipod_classic -> ipod

It's an iPod

BUR #29601 has been rejected.

remove implication ipod_nano -> ipod
remove implication ipod_shuffle -> ipod
remove implication ipod_touch -> ipod
create implication ipod_classic -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_nano -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_shuffle -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_touch -> digital_media_player
mass update ipod_classic -> -ipod
mass update ipod_nano -> -ipod
mass update ipod_shuffle -> -ipod
mass update ipod_touch -> -ipod

Per topic #17199, ipod should be for when you don't know the model, just as specific phone designs like iPhone X don't imply iphone. The implications for other iPods were created nine years ago in topic #12098 as one of the first BURs, so they probably aren't the best example of what we should do today.

ipod_model tags should imply digital media player as ipod does and existing ipod_model -> ipod implications should be removed. ipod remains useful for when you can't tell which model it is, or the artist drew a unique iPod that doesn't exist.

LQ said:

BUR #29601 has been rejected.

remove implication ipod_nano -> ipod
remove implication ipod_shuffle -> ipod
remove implication ipod_touch -> ipod
create implication ipod_classic -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_nano -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_shuffle -> digital_media_player
create implication ipod_touch -> digital_media_player
mass update ipod_classic -> -ipod
mass update ipod_nano -> -ipod
mass update ipod_shuffle -> -ipod
mass update ipod_touch -> -ipod

Per topic #17199, ipod should be for when you don't know the model, just as specific phone designs like iPhone X don't imply iphone. The implications for other iPods were created nine years ago in topic #12098 as one of the first BURs, so they probably aren't the best example of what we should do today.

ipod_model tags should imply digital media player as ipod does and existing ipod_model -> ipod implications should be removed. ipod remains useful for when you can't tell which model it is, or the artist drew a unique iPod that doesn't exist.

Wasn't aware of how iPhone tags are set up, that works with me.

The bulk update request #29593 (forum #297150) has been rejected by @Trouble_Windows.

BUR #29603 has been rejected.

mass update walkman_b_series -> -digital_walkman
create implication walkman_e_series -> digital_media_player
mass update walkman_e_series -> -digital_walkman
create implication walkman_nw-s203f -> digital_media_player
mass update walkman_nw-s203f -> -digital_walkman
mass update walkman_w_series -> -digital_walkman

This should probably be done too if we're doing the above.

On second thought, I'm... Not actually a fan of how iPhone currently functions, it requires users to search a wildcard to find any post with an iPhone rather than the much more intuitive option of simply searching iPhone. Indistinguishable models can still be found with iphone -iphone_*.

The original PlayStation comparison doesn't work because the PlayStation is a different console entirely from say, the PlayStation 2.

I don't like it either; it's unintuitive for both users and uploaders. It's just how it is, per the linked thread

LQ said:

I don't like it either; it's unintuitive for both users and uploaders. It's just how it is, per the linked hread

Then why keep it the way it is? We don't have to if others agree.

Trouble_Windows said:

On second thought, I'm... Not actually a fan of how iPhone currently functions, it requires users to search a wildcard to find any post with an iPhone rather than the much more intuitive option of simply searching iPhone. Indistinguishable models can still be found with iphone -iphone_*.

I agree with this tbh.

The bulk update request #29603 (forum #297177) has been rejected by @Trouble_Windows.

BUR #31259 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication ipod_classic -> ipod
create implication iphone_3g -> iphone
remove implication iphone_x -> smartphone
create implication iphone_x -> iphone
remove implication iphone_11 -> smartphone
create implication iphone_11 -> iphone
remove implication iphone_11_pro -> smartphone
create implication iphone_11_pro -> iphone
create implication iphone_12 -> iphone
create implication iphone_12_pro -> iphone
create implication iphone_13 -> iphone

Alternative BUR that eliminates the weird and unintuitive "iPhone is not an umbrella tag for all iPhones and only refers to unidentified iPhones" thing.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #29601 (forum #297171) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #31259 (forum #306385) has been approved by @nonamethanks.