BUR #28405 has been rejected.
create alias heel-less_legwear -> stirrup_legwear
I thought it might be for legwear where the heel is missing while the toes are covered, but all the posts I saw were just stirrup_legwear.
Posted under Tags
BUR #28405 has been rejected.
create alias heel-less_legwear -> stirrup_legwear
I thought it might be for legwear where the heel is missing while the toes are covered, but all the posts I saw were just stirrup_legwear.
There are some examples where it is just the heel that is open: post #617348, post #3439781, post #7009131
stirrup legwear already implies toeless legwear, should it also imply this tag? I understand the fetish reasons behind the current implication.
nonamethanks said:
stirrup legwear already implies toeless legwear, should it also imply this tag? I understand the fetish reasons behind the current implication.
Renim cleaned it up recently; when I submitted the BUR, over half the tag was just stirrup_legwear. In any case, I don't even think the system would let you request that implication, as stirrup_legwear would make up 99.9% of heel-less_legwear.
Legwear that's only missing the toe covering is not uncommon, which is why toeless_legwear has over double the posts of stirrup_legwear. Legwear that's only missing the heel covering, however, is not. I'm indifferent about whether it needs a tag, but if we decide it does, then heel-less_legwear is unfortunately an intuitive, yet terrible name. Renim's gardening is evidence that the tag will simply keep being added to random stirrup legwear posts.
The bulk update request #28405 (forum #292198) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #28522 (forum #292906) has been rejected by @AngryZapdos.