Is full breasts useful?

BUR #28327 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nuke full_breasts

I'm not so sure of this tag's utility. From what I gather, it looks mostly like large_breasts -sagging_breasts shorthand (yes I stole this example), and there would be significant overlap with just large breasts in general.

The wiki also doesn't really help, and is confusing to boot:

Significantly more malleability and elastic so cases of bouncing breasts would be more comical

Added a BUR for voting, whether it goes through or not.

I'm going to go ahead and nuke it. While naively it would make sense to have a tag like this, in practice this tag could never work on a site like this because it would just be equivalent with large_breasts or huge_breasts or gigantic_breasts. And there's zero chance any wiki clause in a tag called "full breasts" is ever going to be read by the people adding this tag to thousands or tens of thousands of posts just because they think the breasts look "full".

A discussion on discord makes it clear that even the tag creator had no idea what this tag could actually apply to, or what the definition really was, so there's zero hope it'll be anything other than a pet tag turned padding.

The bulk update request #28327 (forum #291823) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nonamethanks said:

A discussion on discord makes it clear that even the tag creator had no idea what this tag could actually apply to, or what the definition really was, so there's zero hope it'll be anything other than a pet tag turned padding.

I'm going to be the devil's advocate (as usual), and try to surmise what the tag was supposed to be (although I haven't read the discussion on Discord)
I think the purpose of the tag was to have a tag for breasts that are particularly round and firm, akin to breast implants irl.
A tag like that could make sense imo, although I do share the doubts that people would actually read the wiki and tag it properly.