imply boulder, pebble -> rock

BUR #26336 has been rejected.

create implication boulder -> rock
create implication pebble -> rock

It's not just a boulder... it's a rock! A rock!

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #26336 (forum #280953) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Can I get a second look at this?

Why do we need an umbrella tag for small pebbles on the side of the road and huge rocks in scenery? Do post #7803226 and post #7829530 really need an umbrella tag just because there's a rock in it?

nonamethanks said:

Why do we need an umbrella tag for small pebbles on the side of the road and huge rocks in scenery? Do post #7803226 and post #7829530 really need an umbrella tag just because there's a rock in it?

I guess not. So should rock only be used for medium-sized rocks? Or deprecated?

As it stands it's a useless tag that is too broad and should be deprecated. We don't need an umbrella for giant boulders, pebbles, stone walls, ancient paved roads etc.

The problem is that we *do* need a specific tag for the kind of rocks that people hold, throw and hit each other with. And those are just called "rocks".