BUR #23539 has been rejected.
create implication hair_over_one_eye -> hair_between_eyes
How would hair be over an eye, without also being between eyes?
Posted under Tags
BUR #23539 has been rejected.
create implication hair_over_one_eye -> hair_between_eyes
How would hair be over an eye, without also being between eyes?
While you're technically right, this goes against the way people use these tags. Users looking for hair between eyes posts are looking for posts where both eyes are visible, implicating hair over one eye would pollute the search and make a negative search necessary for anyone who doesn't want the posts with an obscured eye.
Echoeing what HeeroWingZero said, while it's technically right, grouping something like post #7234594 and post #7238626 together in this way would make very little sense. Not having an implication would also make it possible to find hairstyles like post #7051260, for which both would apply by most standards.
The bulk update request #23539 (forum #269600) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.