Looking_through_legs & view_between_legs - implication, or mutually exclusive?

Title pretty much explains the question. Looking through legs is fine since it's from the character's perspective., but I'm wondering if view between legs should imply the former since that covers the viewer's perspective of seeing the character's upside-down face between their legs. Or should they be kept separate since a character's perspective is mutually exclusive from a viewer's perspective?

I'm undecided on being mutually exclusive or not (currently leaning yes) but at the least I think they shouldn't be implicated. View between legs should be a framing device imo. There are several things in looking through legs that don't use the legs to frame the whole image, or at least most of it, so they shouldn't be tagged view between legs.

Oh, also, you got the suggested implications backwards. Looking through legs would implicate view between legs, not the other way around.