Posted under Tags
BUR #22042 has been rejected.
create implication bluey_(bluey) -> bluey_heeler
create implication bandit_(bluey) -> bandit_heeler
create implication bingo_(bluey) -> bingo_heeler
create implication chilli_(bluey) -> chilli_heeler
That is Bluey's family name. It was confirmed in Season 1 (Pirates)
You mean alias to Bluey's family name, I think? I don't really have much of an opinion on the idea overall, but I'd recommend switching implicate to alias, as otherwise you'd end up with bluey (bluey) and "bluey heeler" showing up on every post featuring the character, which is just tag bloat (assuming it goes through that is).
The bulk update request #22042 (forum #263389) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
BUR #22680 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias bluey_(bluey) -> bluey_heeler
create alias bandit_(bluey) -> bandit_heeler
create alias bingo_(bluey) -> bingo_heeler
create alias bingo_heeler_(bluey) -> bingo_heeler
Similar to the above BUR, but with aliases instead of implications and includes the current tag used for Bingo. We don't seem to have any posts with Chili yet, so I didn't include any aliases for her.
BUR #22681 has been rejected.
create alias bluey_heeler -> bluey_(bluey)
create alias bandit_heeler -> bandit_(bluey)
create alias bingo_heeler_(bluey) -> bingo_(bluey)
create alias bingo_heeler -> bingo_(bluey)
Inverse to the above BUR in case we want them going the other way instead.
The bulk update request #22680 (forum #266222) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #22681 (forum #266225) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
