Posted under Tags
BUR #21635 has been approved by @evazion.
rename clause -> clause_(len'en)
deprecate clause
('Bout time I made a thread for these...)
So for this one, it's a basic "let's qualify" this suggestion. While spelled differently compared to some of the other character's of the same name, Clause's specific spelling is not unique at all. There's even already another Clause on here that's qualified! (clause (king's raid)) It should be qualified I think, as the name is common enough.
BUR #21676 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication ex-sese -> kitsugai_sese
The bulk update request #21635 (forum #261613) has been approved by @evazion.
The bulk update request #21676 (forum #261744) has been approved by @evazion.
Small question: Is there any value in tagging the different personalities of Kuzu Suzumi? They are mainly differentiated by eye color, but they are each characters in their own right that I feel should be tagged (and thus implicated to the main umbrella tag). (Blue Archive spoilers?) Then again, we do have Aris (Blue Archive) and <key> (Blue Archive), but those are two very different tagging situations, from what I understand. Not to mention that that is apparently a spoiler for Blue Archive, whereas it wouldn't be considered one in the case of Len'en.
Updated
BUR #22549 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication cine_hamal -> kuzu_suzumi
create implication arde_(len'en) -> kuzu_suzumi
create implication benny_(len'en) -> kuzu_suzumi
Let's get this ball rolling as a proposal and see what works out, but in this case, I think it'd be beneficial.
Maiden_in_Orange said:
BUR #22549 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication cine_hamal -> kuzu_suzumi
create implication arde_(len'en) -> kuzu_suzumi
create implication benny_(len'en) -> kuzu_suzumiLet's get this ball rolling as a proposal and see what works out, but in this case, I think it'd be beneficial.
I think arde also needs a qualifier (there's liliruca_arde).
BUR #22550 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename arde -> arde_(len'en)
Oh you're absolutely right. This is what happens when random members haphazardly make and populate the tags. I knew there was another "Arde" of some sort around here somewhere...
The bulk update request #22550 (forum #265664) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #22549 (forum #265662) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #24209 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication houlen_yabusame_(chef_form) -> houlen_yabusame
create implication enraku_tsubakura_(waiter_form) -> enraku_tsubakura
create implication houlen_yabusame_(slime) -> houlen_yabusame
create implication enraku_tsubakura_(slime) -> enraku_tsubakura
create implication santa_clause_(len'en) -> clause_(len'en)
create implication ghost_(xmas)_(len'en) -> ghost_(len'en)
create implication zuifeng_tenkai_(melon) -> zuifeng_tenkai
create implication kuzu_suzumi_(summer_sparrow_acting_behind_the_scenes) -> kuzu_suzumi
create implication houlen_yabusame_(feo) -> houlen_yabusame
create implication kurohebi_(feo) -> kurohebi
Book of the Cafe may now be effectively dead, but it did leave behind several official alternate costumes in its wake.
The exception to this is the one for Senri Tsurubami, which is basically the form they took when they pretended to be Tsubakura in Evanescent Existence. That...I honestly have no idea how to deal with. It seems to mainly be covered under a Senri Tsurubami + Enraku Tsubakura (Cosplay) search at the moment, but is there any precedent for tagging characters who actively pretended to be other characters, with the disguise being treated as effectively an official alternate costume like in this case? Would it be a bad idea to have that be a tag?
The bulk update request #24209 (forum #272425) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
BUR #27802 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create implication taira_no_fumikado_(human) -> taira_no_fumikado
create implication taira_no_chouki_(living) -> taira_no_chouki
More alt Len'en chartags needing implicating.
The bulk update request #27802 (forum #286564) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
