BUR #19790 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename cappuccino_(drink) -> cappuccino
Not really sure why this is qualified. It'd be like having lasagne_(food) instead of lasagne.
Posted under Tags
BUR #19790 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename cappuccino_(drink) -> cappuccino
Not really sure why this is qualified. It'd be like having lasagne_(food) instead of lasagne.
I really hate that this reasoning seems to be catching on. What, are we also going to alias apple to apple_(fruit) because we have artists with names like apple2e and appleq? Or soda to soda_(drink) because of all these guys?
Ignoring the fact that the biggest artist tag in question is just a Twitter handle and not even their actual name, anyone searching for sky cappuccino's art (or any other artist with cappuccino in their name) isn't going to just type "cappuccino" and then hit enter. Anyone searching for actual cappuccinos, however, will. We shouldn't be babyproofing our tags to this absurd degree where commonplace, everyday object are being qualified because a couple of somewhat similar artist tags exist; contrary to popular belief, the majority of our userbase are in fact more intelligent than five-year-olds, and thus able to tell the difference between red and blue text.
redtails said:
An extra bonus of having qualifiers on tags is that you can then search for those qualifiers to find e.g. all the types of drinks.
We have drink if you just don't care what kind it is. I would also point to tag group:food tags if you just want to see a list of food tags, but it doesn't even have cappuccino so it's obviously not up to date.
I agree with AngryZapdos, commonplace everyday items shouldn't need to be qualified. If mario can go unqualified because it's expected that people are smart enough to figure out who that tag is for, then everyday food items should be able to as well.
The bulk update request #19790 (forum #253525) has been approved by @nonamethanks.