nuke implied_virgin

BUR #19781 has been rejected.

nuke implied_virgin

This tag is pointless. The criteria for it is unclear, making even its use on the current handful of posts questionable.

All of the tags currently tagged with implied virgin show virginity without defloration. I created the tag years ago at evazion's suggestion (forum #167364) because virgin was already taken, but I'd argue they should be moved to virgin instead.

The problem is that virgin is currently aliased to defloration. At some point it was even the main tag for defloration: topic #18245. We need to remove that implication first and sort that tree of tags. See the discussion I started three years ago in forum #164253.

Opened topic #25098.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #19781 (forum #253495) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.