Posted under Tags
BUR #19277 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
In eight years it hasn't even been tagged 100 times, despite applying to hundreds of thousands of posts (almost certainly to the point of superfluousness). We also have other, more specific tags like raised_eyebrow and eyebrow_cut that do a far more meaningful job.
I thought it might've been confused with mismatched eyebrows but found no example of that when going through the tag.
The bulk update request #19277 (forum #251399) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
Then how do we tag these when neither eyebrow appears to be raised?
Half v-shaped eyebrows: post #6635493, post #4067271 (arguably raised left eyebrow, but also "v" right)
Half furrowed brow: post #3840646
Downward curve and upward curve: post #6633089, post #4966467
Lowered eyebrow: post #3267611
? (whatever this is it caused a user to tag): post #3924359
You say "despite applying to hundreds of thousands of posts" as if I can skim several pages and locate a handful of posts where this would meaningfully apply. This is not the case, excluding raised_eyebrow, eyebrow_cut, and mismatched_eyebrows (also these 3 are only 8k posts). I can see that the tag name sounds ambiguous and would require a wiki. It's more to do way the eyebrows shape or point differently. Eyebrows that simply have one raised without other descriptors can be excluded and left as raised_eyebrow.
I do not like the way some raised eyebrow posts are tagged. I wouldn't count post #6861919 as one. post #6751041 is sharply half v'd down into the eye.
Updated
nanashi3 said:
Then how do we tag these when neither eyebrow appears to be raised?
Half v-shaped eyebrows: post #6635493, post #4067271 (arguably raised left eyebrow, but also "v" right)
Half furrowed brow: post #3840646
Downward curve and upward curve: post #6633089, post #4966467
Lowered eyebrow: post #3267611
? (whatever this is it caused a user to tag): post #3924359You say "despite applying to hundreds of thousands of posts" as if I can skim several pages and locate a handful of posts where this would meaningfully apply. This is not the case, excluding raised_eyebrow, eyebrow_cut, and mismatched_eyebrows (also these 3 are only 8k posts). I can see that the tag name sounds ambiguous and would require a wiki. It's more to do way the eyebrows shape or point differently. Eyebrows that simply have one raised without other descriptors can be excluded and left as raised_eyebrow.
I do not like the way some raised eyebrow posts are tagged. I wouldn't count post #6861919 as one. post #6751041 is sharply half v'd down into the eye.
You tag them with the expression they're conveying. "Asymmetrical eyebrows" is incredibly broad and could apply to any facial expression. Nobody is searching for any character with asymmetrical eyebrows, it's a useless meta-concept for us to tag.
nonamethanks said:
You tag them with the expression they're conveying. "Asymmetrical eyebrows" is incredibly broad and could apply to any facial expression. Nobody is searching for any character with asymmetrical eyebrows, it's a useless meta-concept for us to tag.
Then how do we tag those expressions?
～ shape seems kinda distinctive. Don't tag every slight difference, just the more notable ones.
