imply mountainous_horizon -> mountain

BUR #17789 has been rejected.

create implication mountainous_horizon -> mountain

Can't have a mountainous horizon without mountains.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

Late reply to the thread, but shouldn't these be kept separate? Or at least have a focus tag made for mountains. I struggle to see why some of these mountainous horizon posts should be tagged with mountain, using post #6556929 as an example. It's accurate to tag this as mountainous horizon, but would anyone searching just for mountains want to see this?

This would be the same reason the imply ocean -> water BUR didn't pass; nobody looking for mountains wants to see the typically tiny specks of silhouette in mountainous horizon. While some of the 3902 mountainous_horizon -mountain results are surely mistagged by omission, I don't know if that's worth mucking up a whole tag (more than it already is, a la post #6554418).

P.S. Thanks for linking that post, I fixed it.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #17789 (forum #245453) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.