Imply bike_shorts_under_skirt -> bike_shorts

BUR #16847 has been rejected.

create implication bike_shorts_under_skirt -> bike_shorts

Wearing bike shorts under a skirt requires wearing bike shorts

Related, topic #21488

DangerNightime said:

Related, topic #21488

Well I completely missed that.
I will point out, though, that the implication of bike_shorts_under_shorts implying bike_shorts already exists. It doesn't really make much sense to me to have one of these implications but not the other.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #16847 (forum #241520) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.