(Probably not) Spoilers Blue Archive Implication Request

BUR #16565 has been rejected.

create implication <key>_(blue_archive) -> aris_(blue_archive)

As the wiki says, it's literally just Aris but with pink eyes instead of blue, the only image not tagged with Aris as well is post #6209026 which I assume is a mistake. I wasn't sure if this is considered a spoiler or not (the part that mentions the above is not marked as such in the wiki) but a bunch of posts with <key> are tagged as such.

Why are post #6257631 and post #6257731 tagged with it? Is it the robot?

nonamethanks said:

Why are post #6257631 and post #6257731 tagged with it? Is it the robot?

afaik it is, which is why I'm not quite convinced.

Username_Hidden said:

afaik it is, which is why I'm not quite convinced.

I'm not caught up on jp story but if this is true, we can always make a (mutually exclusive to <key>, unless both are in the same image) <key> (robot) chartag for such depictions.

IIRC Key lost her body (to be vague about it since specifics are unnecessary), but later they created a new one for her, which is the little robot.

I support the <key>_(robot) suggestion since visually they have nothing in common.

I like the tag, but I think it's counterintuitive to separate it from <key>.

Username_Hidden said:

I like the tag, but I think it's counterintuitive to separate it from <key>.

realized the same when I was gardening <key> (robot) but forgot I claimed the contrary earlier. updated.

I don't know if it makes much sense for us to imply <key> to Aris if half of her pics are going to be of the robot keychain. It seems to me that this case is closer to identical twins than a skin/costume.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #16565 (forum #240186) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

BUR #17526 has been rejected.

create implication <key>_(robot)_(blue_archive) -> <key>_(blue_archive)

I guess?

I don't feel that implication's useful. I highly doubt anyone searching for <key>_(blue_archive) is looking for the robot.

Moreover, it will mean just about every single properly tagged picture of aris_(maid)_(blue_archive) will also be tagged <key>_(blue_archive), which will make it literally impossible to search for pictures of Maid Aris and non-robot Key together. (Edit: This is already difficult to do because people have been tagging the proposed implication manually and inconsistently, so the tags need to be cleaned up, but I think one ought to be able to find images like post #6247694 via chartags.)

I think we should look to precedents like barbatos (genshin impact) and rex lapis (genshin impact) which aren't implicated to their humanoid forms, though those have the confounding factor of being bigger spoilers than Robot Key are.

That is a fair argument, but the wikis should be updated to specify that.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #17526 (forum #244454) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

I've updated the wikis.
Unfortunately, I can't think of a good way to advise users on how to use the tag, without spoiling anyone who looks at the wikis while not already aware of Key's robot form.
We could spoiler tag it like on the Genshin Impact characters' wiki pages, but I'm not sure it's a big enough deal to warrant that.
This whole thing feels trivial with plana (blue archive) also being an unavoidable spoiler.

If there are no last minute objections, I'll go through and remove the <key> (blue archive) tag from all images that only contain <key> (robot) (blue archive) in a couple of days.