Zastava M70 implications

BUR #16059 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication zastava_m70 -> assault_rifle
create implication zastava_m70 -> kalashnikov_rifle

Similar to previous forum #227016 for the sake of consistency. It's the Yugoslav copy of the AKM.

Unfunny moderator said:
Re: Title:
Either make an April Fools post or make a serious post, but don’t try to do both at the same time.

Yes, this is an actual BUR. Thank you for correcting the title. I will be more careful with copy paste feature next time.

Re: Title:
Either make an April Fools post or make a serious post, but don’t try to do both at the same time.

Nazi_troll said:

Yes, this is an actual BUR.

Then give it a correct title from the get-go instead of trying to incite political strife again.

Note for others: This topic originally had a political troll name, which this unfunny moderator changed to something useful, but it’s not showing as edited by me because the OP edited his post again afterwards.

Also, you’ve been told before not to edit your posts to reply to posts after yours.

World_Funeral said:

Thank you for correcting the title. I will be more careful with copy paste feature next time.

You’re seriously editing your post again right after I reminded you not to do that?

And now you’re pretending you made a copy & paste mistake after your attempt at pushing your political agenda under the guise of an April Fools joke failed? There’s no way that was a simple mistake, especially after your own admission that you were trying to be “funny” (by calling me “unfunny moderator”). smh

kittey said:

You’re seriously editing your post again right after I reminded you not to do that?
And now you’re pretending you made a copy & paste mistake after your attempt at pushing your political agenda under the guise of an April Fools joke failed? There’s no way that was a simple mistake, especially after your own admission that you were trying to be “funny” (by calling me “unfunny moderator”). smh

Apologies for that. Well, at first I think creating multiple replies in response of others' simple forum topic reply would not worth it (seems spammy). Someone advised to keep forums as clean as possible. To be honest, we cannot simply accuse other's intention and I won't such again next time.

World_Funeral said:

Well, at first I think creating multiple replies in response of others' simple forum topic reply would not worth it (seems spammy). Someone advised to keep forums as clean as possible.

Just in case you seriously didn’t understand the advice to keep the forums as clean as possible:

• If you want to add something to a topic and the last post is from you, you should not add another post below yours but instead edit that last post and append whatever you want to add (unless you’re replying to someone before you who keeps editing his post).
• If you want to reply to someone and your last post is not the last post under that topic, make a new post.

The bulk update request #16059 (forum #237493) has been approved by @nonamethanks.