I personally find lolicon absolutely disgusting for obvious reason but if it's just a simple panty shot it's personally fine. But even the slightest suggestiveness in photographs of children is an automatic no.
Yet others still called me a lolicon and that no matter how mild or even vaguely implied the suggestive content in question is that still makes me no different than all those real life child exploiters like Jeffrey Epstein, Ian Watkins, etc.
I'm confused...why am I still being treated like a criminal despite these strict limits?
Updated by Unbreakable