Im always here if it wasnt clear from my previous posts. Im not breaking any rules in doing so. I think my question was fair to ask. Blindly tagging stuff as AI doesnt seem fair to me. At least post a reason why
Fair enough, I was a little too aggressive there, my bad I know it's not my business, but you should consider uploading more of other artists' works or at least not focusing too much on editing exclusively for unstableboiler artworks. Otherwise, people might think you have a bias favoring them
I think all their illustrations from 2023 are at least AI assisted with no mention about it, the artist definitely knows how to draw decently, but was accused of using AI at first because of the quality spike from their previous works from 2022. They have copied others' artworks, upscaled and painted over parts of them in the past (post #5628696), that's why in their Pixiv bio they mention "Characters and backgrounds sometimes inspired by other works". I wouldn't doubt they added AI to the process.
I'm pretty sure that booogtake's images are AI-generated based on modare style. There might not be as many artifacts, but after playing with Novel-AI, adding 'modare' in a prompt gives me pretty much the same artstyle so I'm very certain
So I recently flagged this post seeing the ai-generated tag on it (and comment #2375536 on another of this "artist's" posts, post #7007564), thinking it was full AI. However, this post recently got approved in spite of this evidence. I know it's easy to claim AI on certain posts when it isn't actually true, but I do think there is more truth than not here.
So I recently flagged this post seeing the ai-generated tag on it (and comment #2375536 on another of this "artist's" posts, post #7007564), thinking it was full AI. However, this post recently got approved in spite of this evidence. I know it's easy to claim AI on certain posts when it isn't actually true, but I do think there is more truth than not here.
post #7009866 - artifact at the hair tip post #7024968 - hair merging with that white part on her bun, Unnatural hatching on the sweater that looks like artifacts post #7007564 - flower merging with white part, the ear, hair tip
There's definitely AI involved in their works, But there's also a lot of human input
The lineart was redraw/traced from AI and a lot of the rendering was done by AI. Judging by the lineart and their painting technique, it's clear they're not skilled enough to keep up with AI render style sometimes ,so I doubt they're able to draw that good as well.
finding some AI involvement using post #6707341 as example - The background is already obvious - You can easily see which part of the rendering was done by human and which part was done by AI because the resolution is all over the place. They awfully upscaled the original AI gens, clipped it onto base-color's layer and then used airbrush and flat blush to clean up some parts - Some parts that was rendered by AI weren't even cleaned up properly. Just look at the section between the panties's lineart and her navel, there's a black spot that was left over because they have AI rendered the whole body (including black bikini). But they didn't clean up the bikini from the skin layer that was done by AI, that's why there's a weird black spot left over there
post #7032800 does not look AI-generated to me, but I would like to request a check just in case, because the artist's Patreon "about" section states that "(...) Generated AI is used for illustrations".
post #7032800 does not look AI-generated to me, but I would like to request a check just in case, because the artist's Patreon "about" section states that "(...) Generated AI is used for illustrations".
I think it’s AI. I marked a bunch of easily fixable artifacts here
I think it’s AI. I marked a bunch of easily fixable artifacts here
Thank you for the quick reply and detailed analysis. I thought the chin and right arm artifacts could have been attributed to it being unfinished, but with the other zones...
post #6603845 The third-party mentions it could be AI. Most of what I found about the actual artist are coloring of others' works and some artworks with different artstyle and no filters. A couple people talked about AI on twitter #1687860840245190656 and twitter #1687984068661547008 with no reply.
So, given how wide the scope of the "AI-assisted" tag is, ranging from using it to generate simple background to a literal tracing of AI art. Should we create a tag "AI-generated background" to cover this discrepancy? Since I think using AI to generate background is much more tolerable usage of AI than let the AI do 90% of the work for you.
post #6912493 (Warning: NSFW) recently got undeleted for god knows what reason despite the general consensus of being ai-generated. Can someone go flag that? Or is there something here I'm not seeing?
