GBF Cidala implications

BUR #12013 has been rejected.

create implication huang_(granblue_fantasy) -> cidala_(granblue_fantasy)
create implication bai_(granblue_fantasy) -> cidala_(granblue_fantasy)
create implication laolao_(granblue_fantasy) -> cidala_(granblue_fantasy)

The wiki states that the tag should be used when any one of the trio appears.

BUR #12015 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

nuke cidala_(granblue_fantasy)

Counter proposal: it's a useless padding tag. It would make more sense if it was used only when all three are present, but all three are always present: cidala_(granblue_fantasy) solo has 9 results.

I can see where you're coming from, but:
- There were a few untagged artworks, the count of solo artworks goes up to 15
- I don't know how to feel about making two different searches to not miss any post. cidala_(granblue_fantasy) is more intuitive than ~huang_(granblue_fantasy) ~bai_(granblue_fantasy) (and optionally ~laolao_(granblue_fantasy), although he does not have any solo artwork yet)

They're different characters. If you want to see both at the same time you search for both at the same time. Or you would if there was more than a page of posts where they're not together.

The bulk update request #12013 (forum #220229) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.

The bulk update request #12015 (forum #220234) has been approved by @nonamethanks.