Posted under Tags
This topic has been locked.
Futas are a special thing that has no counterpart in reality, they are a product of hentai magic and have their own tags to get rid of them.
"Newhalves" are an obvious mistake in tagging, since as far as I can tell they're explicitly men. Not that I want to look too deeply into that mess.
Slapping a pair of tits on a dude does not make a woman.
kittey said:
Danbooru allows NSFW content, but it’s not the main purpose. It’s undeniable that a large part of the userbase come here for the NSFW content, though.
NSFW is not a trivial amount (~22.56%) but it is the biggest source of complaints with misapplied tagging, about as much as the rating: tags themselves when NSFW art is mis-tagged. Also the only reason you even see suggestions to tag 1girl for SFW art is because it's Bridget, I highly doubt it would be accepted for other characters that don't pass if such exist on here, and again, it isn't how trap characters get tagged no matter.
GuntJohnson said:
Futas are a special thing that has no counterpart in reality, they are a product of hentai magic and have their own tags to get rid of them."Newhalves" are an obvious mistake in tagging, since as far as I can tell they're explicitly men. Not that I want to look too deeply into that mess.
Slapping a pair of tits on a dude does not make a woman.
Futanari are at least a half-truth since they are girls, who somehow acquire dicks, and that's it. They're also a lot more common without being a nightmare to tag most of the time.
Ah here we go with your kind's usual modus operandi.
If you show ANYTHING but complete and total unquestioning support they go off with their zoomer insults.
How about you show some of that "tolerance" your kind loves to use as a battering ram so much and consider that there might be people with fetishes different to yours who don't want to jack it to dudes?
Proper tagging is paramount to a functioning blacklisting system.
A strong blacklisting system is the cornerstone of having opposing fetishes coexist on a website.
GuntJohnson said:
Ah here we go with your kind's usual modus operandi.
If you show ANYTHING but complete and total unquestioning support they go off with their zoomer insults.How about you show some of that "tolerance" your kind loves to use as a battering ram so much and consider that there might be people with fetishes different to yours who don't want to jack it to dudes?
Proper tagging is paramount to a functioning blacklisting system.
A strong blacklisting system is the cornerstone of having opposing fetishes coexist on a website.
LMAO
I'm a boring-ass "cis" male.
But I'm not going to "tolerate" intolerance.
You're denying the existence newhalf / MTF-trans.
Poison was designed, way back in 1989, as trans.
No one would ever tag her as 1boy, a "dude with a pair of tits slapped on", unless they want a quick trip to Ban Town.
So you can take your 2-day old account, log off, and leave until you're ready to contribute anything of value.
Updated
Well, apparently "nonamethanks"'s post didn't mean anything. I even sent him a message and waited for a while and he didn't reply (and he's active in other threads).
This has zero to do with "intolerance" or "denying the existence of this and that". You're on an image board for drawings.
Correct tagging of male characters as male is not genociding anybody, no matter how much you screech about it being literally violence.
I don't give a shit if you exist or not or what you want to have sex with. In fact, I actively do not want to know.
What I care about is that men get tagged as men and women as women. Bridget is a man and he should be tagged as such, unless it's explicitly a rule63 image of the character.
Proper tagging is the only way everyone gets to have their respective cake.
Clearly this topic is going nowhere and is just going to be the same people arguing to death about semantics and other bullshit, so I'm going to lock it again. Congratulations everyone for what's possibly the worst topic since the Fate/Grand Order wars.
GuntJohnson said:
Well, apparently "nonamethanks"'s post didn't mean anything. I even sent him a message and waited for a while and he didn't reply (and he's active in other threads).
"an opinion that I'm angry about" is not an insult.
The bulk update request #11639 (forum #218486) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
