BUR #11063 has been rejected.
mass update 1girl solo child -female_child -> female_child
301 pages untagged. Did the male equivalent manually.
Posted under Tags
BUR #11063 has been rejected.
mass update 1girl solo child -female_child -> female_child
301 pages untagged. Did the male equivalent manually.
Nameless_Contributor said:
BUR #11063 has been rejected.
mass update 1girl solo child -female_child -> female_child
301 pages untagged. Did the male equivalent manually.
There are questionable posts in that search, which would likely belong to loli. I guess we will have to do it manually as well...
I'm going to have to go 'meh' here, because I've found instances where even when it's tagged solo, child was tagged and it didn't refer to the solo character (typically either a child in the background, or a baby), as if children didn't count as people in some past tagging standards.
The bulk update request #10523 (forum #213721) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
In any other case, I would be questioning why the implication BUR wasn't approved, but in light of topic #21641 and the concerns raised over child, it's entirely fair. At the very least, if child survives that topic, then this BUR will be here to be manually approved by those with the power.
The bulk update request #11063 (forum #216035) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.